• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Small Digital Camera

L

lessthanjakejohn

Limp Gawd
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
397
I want a small digital camera that I could possibly fit in my wallet and definately dit in my pocket. Any such thing?
 
yea, there are little 64mb cameras. they are small and have no lcd of course. they are around 1megapixel and are really crappy quality. sorry i dont have brand or any information. ill check.
 
Wow stuff gets moved quick :p

I now know of one made my Logitech. Seems decent enough. The quality is of little concern with portability being the heighest. Must be under 100 dollars
 
If you want highend, this is the one:

sonyhandbig.jpg


But the price tag is......$US 4,000 ;)
 
i have a logitech pocket digital camera

its the size of a credit card, has a resolution of 1.3 megapixels, it can store 52 pictures and it's usb

$60

only drawback is that it sucks real bad indoors without any good lighting because it doesnt have a flash.

it's mostly and outside use day-time only camera
 
Yes but with such low quality how would even a small camera help. What at low quality would be worth taking a picture of.
 
How about the new Sony DSC-T1?
It is roughly 3.6 x 2.4 x 0.8 in, weighs 7.1 oz.
Here's a link

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2004_reviews/t1.html

It is not cheap ($450 at less than reputable places to about $550), but it has the best feature set in its size class.
5 mp, 3x optical zoom, and a movie mode (with audio!) that is equivalent to that of a low-mid range camcorder (640x480 at 30fps). The movie mode is better than that on more expensive digicams. On a 256 MB ($90 or so) memory stick pro duo card it can do about 90 highest res shots, or about 4 minutes of continuous video. This doesn't sound like much time, but most video clips should last 3-30 sec. Beyond that you start to lose the audience. I haven't bought it yet, but am sooooo tempted.
 
Originally posted by agentzero9
Yes but with such low quality how would even a small camera help. What at low quality would be worth taking a picture of.
Click to expand...

1.3 megapixels is not bad at all... I have a 2.0 canon from quite a few years ago that takes pictures well enough for a 8x10 printout. I have a feeling that 1.3 will be good enough for internet stuff
 
Originally posted by lessthanjakejohn
1.3 megapixels is not bad at all... I have a 2.0 canon from quite a few years ago that takes pictures well enough for a 8x10 printout. I have a feeling that 1.3 will be good enough for internet stuff
Click to expand...

Dude there are HUGE quality differences among identical megapixel cameras. That's why some 2 megapixel cameras are $100 and others are $200.

1.3 doesn't tell much of anything about the quality of the pictures.
 
of course, my 2 pixel camera was top of the line too :eek:

I think one of my friends has the panasonix one. I will borrow it for a few days to see what i think :D
 
Why not go for a Canon S400 or SD100 or something along those lines? While not small enough to fit in a wallet, they are definately small enough to fit in a pocket. They also produce great quality images.
 
That camera looks quite nice for 85. However one of my friends got a logitech for christmas and got bored with it. He is going to sell it for 30 bucks and a few ****** CDs
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top