Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Maxx
Supposedly the X800 is slower than nVidia's offering, but not by a huge amount. There will be at least three variants of the R420/R423 (AGP/PCI-E) core: X800 XT (16 pipelines), X800 Pro (12), X800 SE (8). I suspect the XT will challenge the 6800 Ultra, the Pro will challenge the 6800, and the SE is made for the budget enthusiast.
Originally posted by tazdevl
Since ATI is launching 2 weeks after nVIDIA, they can play around with the clocks a bit before the cards hit the streets. Same thing has happened previous launches where the retail cards had faster clocks than what was announced.
Originally posted by akanafene
Still, it makes sense to wait another few months to get PCI Express edition for just $15 more. [/B]
Originally posted by obs
Screw PCI-E. I am not looking to having to upgrade almost my entire system for a video bandwidth upgrade. I'll probably buy an AGP NV40 (assuming it is good) and hold out as long as I can with my 2.8GHz P4.
Originally posted by obs
Screw PCI-E. I am not looking to having to upgrade almost my entire system for a video bandwidth upgrade. I'll probably buy an AGP NV40 (assuming it is good) and hold out as long as I can with my 2.8GHz P4.
Originally posted by Maxx
As for the pipelines and other things people mentioned...just check the front page today and you will see I was correct.
As for AGP still not being fully utilized, this is true...but also misleading. PCI-E has advantages in things other than bandwidth, such as latency and dual-lane efficiency improvements. It also can handle a lot more power than an AGP slot and can be utilized in a dual-slot configuration for even more power. All four of these advantages will work together especially after Longhorn is released with DX10, as DX10 will use a virtual VRAM system that will start demanding better bandwidth and communication efficiency. And that's just from the video card aspect. The biggest improvements will be in overall system design, since a good deal of a PC's components flow through the now-limiting PCI bus (133 MB/s), including IDE and SATA. Gigabit ethernet will be much better and all of your peripheral devices will work better as well.
Originally posted by war_child
You mention Longhorn in your post, that OS doesn't come out until 2005. If that that holds true, most likely another revision will be out from ATI and Nvidia. Hell who knows we could all be using linux by then ha-ha
Originally posted by Maxx
I never supposed otherwise, in fact I implied that...since we would need DX10 cards to take advantage of it fully.
But PCI-E is going to be around a while. Take a look at how long ISA and then PCI was around. They can't change to a new system too often. Hence my point is, you will have to go PCI-E sooner or later to reap the benefits.
Originally posted by obs
I'm pretty sure Longhorn has been pushed to 2006 with a beta in 2005.
Originally posted by I(illa Bee
[thinks to self]Thats funny, i allready have a copy of longhorn...installed and running on a secound raid array. ..[/thinks to self]
Did i say that out loud?
[hopes] no i didnt [/hopes]
Originally posted by CleanSlate
Well honestly longhorn is just the NT kernel taken from server 2003 (or xp) and upgraded, so... it's a newly upgraded NT kernel + a few new features... so yea.
~Adam
Originally posted by eci
ROFL. You really think you are special don't you? I am sure everyone is jealous that you have a pre-beta version of the OS. I am sure it is fully supported and magnificantly full featured and stable, and jam packed with all the features MS plans for the OS already implemented and working 100%. Microsoft is just waiting another 1.5 years to release it to the rest of us peons right? pfft
Originally posted by CleanSlate
Well yea it's an overhaul of a sorts but I consider that a simple upgrade since it's supposed to be a new OS. And I highly doubt they'd give up most of the windows xp or sk way of doing things just to make a new OS.. I'd bet nearly half if not more is just xp code updated to run with other longhorn stuff. It's just an upgrade.
~Adam