Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tiburon said:I dunno seems to me that if I was going to spend 400 dollars on a video card it better perform flawlessly.
What the hell is it?
bildad said:If you don't know what it is then it's not a problem. Get whatever you want and be happy.
because you're doing a good enough job.theelviscerator said:Why arent the nvidia !!!!!!s pitching a bitch?
HOLY SHIT. At first I was like.. "wtf I don't see anything" and then I saw it at the end of the road. WHAT THE FUCK AM I GOING TO DO NOW! I JUST SPENT $700 on a new fucking system! YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MAD I AM RIGHT NOW.. $700 just gone...Apple740 said:I've posted some vids here in reply 11 on page 1:
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=940319
Well fuck, if I knew that I wouldn't have bought that piece of shit..Advil said:The Nvidia !!!!!!s are pitching a fit... and Nvidia has already responded and claim a patch to fix it will be available soon. Until they either don't deliver a patch, or do deliver a patch that doesn't fix it... we can't bitch much more than we have.
It's not the end of the world, unless they can't fix it.
Look down the road.. there's like this mirage sort of thingie. Shimmering.Nidhogg said:ive looked at the joint ops movies side by side and i cant tell the difference
what am i suposta be looking at here??
Garric said:Look down the road.. there's like this mirage sort of thingie. Shimmering.
Advil said:Nvidia has already responded and claim a patch to fix it will be available soon.
Garric said:Well fuck, if I knew that I wouldn't have bought that piece of shit..
I AM SO MAD.. this was my first top of the line PC to date, I spent over a year saving money to buy it, and now I learn about this bull shit!
THATS NOT THE POINT! I JUST SPENT AN UNGODLY AMOUNT OF MONEY.. at least for me!!! I have a dumb job and I can't just throw shit around like you people do (7800GTX SLI.. wtf? that's just overkill on anything.). I wanted to get something flawless that can at least run a decent game without any crap or anything.. and now this.Yoshiyuki Blade said:omg. No kidding this is blown outta proportion. I mean, look at Nidhogg's first impression. He didn't even notice it until someone described the damned thing. I noticed it my first look but hell, I didn't notice any shimmering when playing Doom III at my friend's on a 6800 NU. All I saw was a bunch of splattered bloody holes on an Imp, beautifully lit by the flashes of the shotgun while it was swiping at me.
The beauty came from the lighting effects, high resolution, and smooth framerate, not lookin a mile down the hall for some shimmering crap.
HighTest said:The only flak for nVIDIA that I have is why they default to not having Clamp on. Works for my 6600GT as well. Since I get great performance and game play happiness, I have no sympathy for your 7800 card as it's got to truely rock and I'm truely envious.
The overal quality improvement of the NV40's and G70's so-called 16x AF is, in fact, much less compared to 8x AF on the GeForce3-FX series. ATI's AF also does not reach the traditional GeForce quality, but at least ATI improved the capabilities of their AF with each real new chip generation (R420 is a beefed-up R300 and no new generation), while Nvidia lowered the hardware capabilities for their AF implementation compared to their own previous generation. The Reviewer's Guide is silent about that fact, it only highlights the possibility of 16x since NV40, making the Reviewer think this must be better than 8x provided by older GeForce series.
The quoted passages from Nvidia's Reviewer's Guide can be easily disproved. That means: All benchmarks using standard settings, no matter if GeForce 7800 or 6800, versus a Radeon, are wrong: Nvidia offers, at this time, the by far worse AF quality. Radeon standard settings are better (speaking in terms of image quality) than 6800 standard settings, whilst the 7800's standard settings are even worse. Thus, the so called "performance" should not be compared either. One should also not compare 7800 standard vs. 6800 standard or 7800 HQ vs 6800 HQ, since the 7800's texture quality is lower. Real "performance" includes on-screen image quality. (Otherwise, why bother to have and benchmark with AF at all? Should an AF implementation just have only minimal impact on the rendering speed or should it result in greatly improved textures?)
What advantage do you have of 16x AF if you get 2x AF at maximum at certain angles only, are exposed to texture shimmering while other cards provide flicker-free textures? All benchmarks using the standard setting for NV40 and G70 against the Radeon are invalid, because the Nvidia cards are using general undersampling which can (and does) result in texture shimmering. We know and love GeForce 7 for the Tranparency Antialiasing and the high-performance implementation of SM3 features, but the GeForce 7 series cannot be configured to deliver flicker-free AF textures while the GeForce 6 series and the Radeon series can (of course) render flicker-free AF quality.
Garric said:THATS NOT THE POINT! I JUST SPENT AN UNGODLY AMOUNT OF MONEY.. at least for me!!! I have a dumb job and I can't just throw shit around like you people do (7800GTX SLI.. wtf? that's just overkill on anything.). I wanted to get something flawless that can at least run a decent game without any crap or anything.. and now this.