TheRapture
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- May 31, 2000
- Messages
- 6,885
OK, let me rant a little, and get opinions.
In a TDM game, there is always "that player" that is obsessed with the highest kill count, so he can "win" the round. So you get a guy that spams/runs/suicides around, gets 150 frags/120 deaths...call it +30 for the team.
...another guy gets only 90 kills/20 deaths....that's +70 for the TEAM....
Now who is the better team player?
Every time you die, you are giving the opposing team a point. So why aren't scores based on what you contribute to the TEAM...?
I have seen guys "win" frag count but with negative KD ratios? They should be at the bottom of the rankings actually IMO.
In a TDM game, there is always "that player" that is obsessed with the highest kill count, so he can "win" the round. So you get a guy that spams/runs/suicides around, gets 150 frags/120 deaths...call it +30 for the team.
...another guy gets only 90 kills/20 deaths....that's +70 for the TEAM....
Now who is the better team player?
Every time you die, you are giving the opposing team a point. So why aren't scores based on what you contribute to the TEAM...?
I have seen guys "win" frag count but with negative KD ratios? They should be at the bottom of the rankings actually IMO.