I was wondering how the SB i3 compares with the i5 in regular day to day home usage. It will primarily be used for web-browzing, collecting photos, videos etc. Mainly for content consumption, with some media editing.
The i3 is dual core but it has hyper-threading. So when you are not CPU constrained, the end user experience should be similar to that of a 4-core (but no HT) i5.
There are times when your application can make use of all the cores but it is typically rare in this usage.
The i5s are in tight supply right now and prices have shot up. MC has the basic i3 2100 for $100; they are all out of the i5s (both K and non K versions). I am thinking of going with a SB i3 to start with and if needed replace it with an IvyBridge i5 once they come out in 6 months. But the i3 has to be good enough!
This PC is going to be a W7/OSX 10.7.2 Lion dual booth machine with an SSD and two drives. May or may not use the on-board graphics (need HD3000 for the CustoMac).
Thoughts?
The i3 is dual core but it has hyper-threading. So when you are not CPU constrained, the end user experience should be similar to that of a 4-core (but no HT) i5.
There are times when your application can make use of all the cores but it is typically rare in this usage.
The i5s are in tight supply right now and prices have shot up. MC has the basic i3 2100 for $100; they are all out of the i5s (both K and non K versions). I am thinking of going with a SB i3 to start with and if needed replace it with an IvyBridge i5 once they come out in 6 months. But the i3 has to be good enough!
This PC is going to be a W7/OSX 10.7.2 Lion dual booth machine with an SSD and two drives. May or may not use the on-board graphics (need HD3000 for the CustoMac).
Thoughts?