cageymaru
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Messages
- 22,091
Incorrect. There's a difference between "removed" and "not yet added."
I don't believe that the AMD cards have been added. Not that it matters in the first place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Incorrect. There's a difference between "removed" and "not yet added."
None of the Polaris cards appear in the list. They probably just don't update it that often.I don't believe that the AMD cards have been added. Not that it matters in the first place.
Drivers don't kick in when you're doing Windows updates. I'm in the Insider Edition fast ring update program and when it does its full update cycle it's about 40 or so minutes pulling power pre-drivers.
BIOS flashing would be the only non-replacement way of fixing this issue.
So we don't even know if it was ever on the list. Basically no new news.
Quick! Fire up the Wayback Machine!So we don't even know if it was ever on the list. Basically no new news.
Is that not the same argument TPU made and this whole thread necro'd over? Everything on the list looks to have been added months prior to actual release as would be standard operating procedure.Then I stand partially corrected (person I replied to still claims that the 1060 was "removed" from the list when it wasn't).
Is that not the same argument TPU made and this whole thread necro'd over? Everything on the list looks to have been added months prior to actual release as would be standard operating procedure.
I had people tell me my motherboard would be dead the same week i installed both my RX 480s, here i am -- still on the same driver 16.6.2 24x7 100% load and no issues on a low end $70 gigabyte board. I think the concerns are vastly overblown, with that said i am not sure what they should of done. Probably lower clocks so they can show power efficiency and run with a single 6pin -- then the aftermarket ones come with 8 pin or two 6 pins as always. Its just kinda crummy situation, the 280x was a rebrand 7970, the 380x not really an improvement over 280x and now the 480 with lower clocks not much improvement over 380x... so I can see why they pushed for higher clocks
The way that the power issue works should not cause an instant blown motherboard. It should place additional wear and tear on the PCIE connection, causing it to degrade faster and fail sooner than anticipated.
It's like eating cake. You won't gain 300lbs after one slice, but if that's all you eat, you'll eventually put on the weight.
I'd switch to the new driver rather than tempt fate.
That's still a bit overblown.
I asked around our friends in the motherboard business for some feedback on this issue - is it something that users should be concerned about or are modern day motherboards built to handle this type of variance? One vendor told me directly that while spikes as high as 95 watts of power draw through the PCIE connection are tolerated without issue, sustained power draw at that kind of level would likely cause damage. The pins and connectors are the most likely failure points - he didn’t seem concerned about the traces on the board as they had enough copper in the power plane to withstand the current.