princess3535
n00b
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2007
- Messages
- 19
I am not sure if I am missing something here can you guys explain this to me:
Look at this review:
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...-radeon-hd-5970-2gb-oc-edition-review-11.html
And this one
http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=855&page=13
Both sites are using an I7 920
Now look at this review:
http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews...-dual-graphics-directx-11-video-card?start=11
91 frames?
The reviewer goes on to say this:
I would like to talk a little about the benchmarks in Call of Duty (World at War). Some people are speculating that due to CPU limitations (not getting the info to the card fast enough), there is a bottleneck. I see and understand the point, but I would like to possibly add something to those remarks. Could it be that the drivers aren’t mature enough yet? While benchmarking the game, I noticed the frame rates would not go over 91 FPS no matter what settings I tried (No AA, No AF,etc.), which may lead to another argument about resolution. I can understand the CPU being the bottleneck at lower resolutions but does it really play that much of a part at 1920 x 1200? If it did, why did frame rates drop as the resolutions went higher? (ATI and NVIDIA) So let’s rethink this. Windows 7 is new, both ATI and NVIDIA’s drivers are new, so could it be lack of maturity or even lack of support by the games developers? I think we will start seeing some differences as drivers mature and Activision comes out with their next patch.
http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews...-dual-graphics-directx-11-video-card?start=14
He is using a I7 870 so is there a CPU bottleneck or am I missing something? I looked on Hard but they did not use COD in testing that I could find. I just don't get it this is the second review of their's that doesn't make sense. So I come to you guys for help I am thinking about a whole new rig here and I was thinking the 870 but damn if a CPU does that much I think I will get a 920.
Thanks for the help guys
dee dee
Look at this review:
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...-radeon-hd-5970-2gb-oc-edition-review-11.html
And this one
http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=855&page=13
Both sites are using an I7 920
Now look at this review:
http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews...-dual-graphics-directx-11-video-card?start=11
91 frames?
The reviewer goes on to say this:
I would like to talk a little about the benchmarks in Call of Duty (World at War). Some people are speculating that due to CPU limitations (not getting the info to the card fast enough), there is a bottleneck. I see and understand the point, but I would like to possibly add something to those remarks. Could it be that the drivers aren’t mature enough yet? While benchmarking the game, I noticed the frame rates would not go over 91 FPS no matter what settings I tried (No AA, No AF,etc.), which may lead to another argument about resolution. I can understand the CPU being the bottleneck at lower resolutions but does it really play that much of a part at 1920 x 1200? If it did, why did frame rates drop as the resolutions went higher? (ATI and NVIDIA) So let’s rethink this. Windows 7 is new, both ATI and NVIDIA’s drivers are new, so could it be lack of maturity or even lack of support by the games developers? I think we will start seeing some differences as drivers mature and Activision comes out with their next patch.
http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews...-dual-graphics-directx-11-video-card?start=14
He is using a I7 870 so is there a CPU bottleneck or am I missing something? I looked on Hard but they did not use COD in testing that I could find. I just don't get it this is the second review of their's that doesn't make sense. So I come to you guys for help I am thinking about a whole new rig here and I was thinking the 870 but damn if a CPU does that much I think I will get a 920.
Thanks for the help guys
dee dee