Phaedrus2129
n00b
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2011
- Messages
- 36
I just got a new Kill-a-Watt (old one got lost like a year ago) and I'm measuring the AC pull from the wall for my main system.
That is,
Q9550 @3.4GHz 1.05V
Asus P5Q Pro
4GB OCZ DDR2 1066 CL5
2x Sapphire Radeon HD4870 1GB @775/1000
Creative X-fi XtremeGamer
Two mechanical hard drives and one SSD
DVD+/-RW drive
Five 120mm fans, one 92mm fan, all with LEDs
Antec HCP-1200 engineering sample
Methodology:
The Kill-a-Watt power meter is plugged into a power strip, and my computer's power cord is plugged into the Kill-a-Watt meter. I perform the computer task I am testing and watch the Kill-a-Watt's display. I record as the continuous range the lowest and highest readings sustained for at least one second. I will also record any notable <1s peak readings. All readings are rounded to the nearest 5W. I then calculate an approximate DC wattage based on a graph of my PSU's 120VAC efficiency.
PSU efficiency:
I've acquired an efficiency curve graph for this power supply. It's a different marque, so efficiency may vary, but this will give an approximate idea as to DC power consumption.
Misc:
Standby: 0.8WAC (probably an erroneous reading--Kill-a-Watt isn't too accurate that low)
Startup: 60-250WAC (280W peak) - 40-220WDC (245W peak)
Idle on desktop: 245-250WAC - 215-220WDC
Heavy Multitasking: 245-255WAC - 215-220WDC
Music from CD: 255-260WAC - 220-230WDC
720p Youtube: 255-260WAC - 225-230WDC
Stress Tests:
3DMark06 GPU test 1: 325-360WAC - 290-320WDC *
3DMark06 GPU test 2: 325-360WAC - 290-320WDC *
3DMark06 CPU tests: 285-300WAC - 250-270WDC *
3DMark06 GPU test 3: 355-400WAC - 315-360WDC *
3DMark06 GPU test 4: 315-325WAC - 280-290WDC *
Intel Burn Test (High): 340-345WAC - 300-305WDC
Prime95 Large FFTs: 315-345WAC - 280-305WDC
Furmark Multi-GPU 1.8.2: 405-415WAC - 375-390WDC **
Furmark+IBT: 430-500WAC - 400-455WDC **
*3DMark06 was tested at the default settings; that is, 1024x768 resolution, low AA&AF.
** Furmark was tested at 1920x1080, Xtreme Burn mode, displacement mapping, PostFX, MSAA x8
Games:
(All games are tested at 1920x1080, or if not then at their highest available resolution, with all available graphics settings set to maximum)
Crysis (Typical level): 350-380WAC - 315-345WDC
Crysis (Final level): 390-420WAC - 360-395WDC
Just Cause 2: 330-385WAC - 295-350WDC
Fallout: New Vegas: 335-355WAC - 300-315WDC
Minecraft Beta: 280-320WAC - 245-285WDC
Super Meat Boy: 250-260WAC - 220-230WDC
Highest load seen: 455WDC / 500WAC
(Under Furmark + Intel Burn Test)
Upcoming:
Maybe some more games?
Final note:
Back when I had my original Kill-a-Watt and only one 4870 I recorded as the maximum in Furmark+IBT just 325WDC, and I recall gaming usually being in the 200-275W range. I don't have those precise figures though. This does indicate that a second 4870 added approximately 130W maximum; since the second card doesn't consume as much power as the first, and a single 4870 is recorded as taking about 150-170W on its own, this jives with common knowledge.
That is,
Q9550 @3.4GHz 1.05V
Asus P5Q Pro
4GB OCZ DDR2 1066 CL5
2x Sapphire Radeon HD4870 1GB @775/1000
Creative X-fi XtremeGamer
Two mechanical hard drives and one SSD
DVD+/-RW drive
Five 120mm fans, one 92mm fan, all with LEDs
Antec HCP-1200 engineering sample
Methodology:
The Kill-a-Watt power meter is plugged into a power strip, and my computer's power cord is plugged into the Kill-a-Watt meter. I perform the computer task I am testing and watch the Kill-a-Watt's display. I record as the continuous range the lowest and highest readings sustained for at least one second. I will also record any notable <1s peak readings. All readings are rounded to the nearest 5W. I then calculate an approximate DC wattage based on a graph of my PSU's 120VAC efficiency.
PSU efficiency:
I've acquired an efficiency curve graph for this power supply. It's a different marque, so efficiency may vary, but this will give an approximate idea as to DC power consumption.
Misc:
Standby: 0.8WAC (probably an erroneous reading--Kill-a-Watt isn't too accurate that low)
Startup: 60-250WAC (280W peak) - 40-220WDC (245W peak)
Idle on desktop: 245-250WAC - 215-220WDC
Heavy Multitasking: 245-255WAC - 215-220WDC
Music from CD: 255-260WAC - 220-230WDC
720p Youtube: 255-260WAC - 225-230WDC
Stress Tests:
3DMark06 GPU test 1: 325-360WAC - 290-320WDC *
3DMark06 GPU test 2: 325-360WAC - 290-320WDC *
3DMark06 CPU tests: 285-300WAC - 250-270WDC *
3DMark06 GPU test 3: 355-400WAC - 315-360WDC *
3DMark06 GPU test 4: 315-325WAC - 280-290WDC *
Intel Burn Test (High): 340-345WAC - 300-305WDC
Prime95 Large FFTs: 315-345WAC - 280-305WDC
Furmark Multi-GPU 1.8.2: 405-415WAC - 375-390WDC **
Furmark+IBT: 430-500WAC - 400-455WDC **
*3DMark06 was tested at the default settings; that is, 1024x768 resolution, low AA&AF.
** Furmark was tested at 1920x1080, Xtreme Burn mode, displacement mapping, PostFX, MSAA x8
Games:
(All games are tested at 1920x1080, or if not then at their highest available resolution, with all available graphics settings set to maximum)
Crysis (Typical level): 350-380WAC - 315-345WDC
Crysis (Final level): 390-420WAC - 360-395WDC
Just Cause 2: 330-385WAC - 295-350WDC
Fallout: New Vegas: 335-355WAC - 300-315WDC
Minecraft Beta: 280-320WAC - 245-285WDC
Super Meat Boy: 250-260WAC - 220-230WDC
Highest load seen: 455WDC / 500WAC
(Under Furmark + Intel Burn Test)
Upcoming:
Maybe some more games?
Final note:
Back when I had my original Kill-a-Watt and only one 4870 I recorded as the maximum in Furmark+IBT just 325WDC, and I recall gaming usually being in the 200-275W range. I don't have those precise figures though. This does indicate that a second 4870 added approximately 130W maximum; since the second card doesn't consume as much power as the first, and a single 4870 is recorded as taking about 150-170W on its own, this jives with common knowledge.