• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

RAIDZ2 Lan Party Performance

staticlag

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
1,679
I attended a LAN party this past weekend and brought my Norco 4220 to share files.

Hardware:
8x Samsung 2TB 5400 green drives
1x OCZ Vertex 2 60GB (L2Arc)
LSI 9211x8 HBA
MB: Asus M3A79T-Deluxe
CPU: Phenom II 940 3.0gHz quad
RAM: Corsair Dominator 8GB DDR2 1066
NIC: PCI Intel gigabit

Software:
OS: Solaris Express 11
Wine 1.31 (self compiled)
DC++ .782

Config:
RAIDZ2 w/ 60 GB SSD L2 ARC

Thoughts:

Wine was throwing errors compiling on Solaris, so I didnt get it working until the night before the LAN party. That meant that I didnt hash any of my files in time for the LAN party. DC++ program hashes all files multiple times before they are shared so that it can offer them in segments for downloading.

Hashing my files I was getting around 80 MB/sec performance.

So I arrive at the LAN party and setup. We had a cisco main switch with 10gig fiber uplinks that I was connected to. about 260 people present all with a gig connection.

Since I was late and my files werent hashed and available for sharing people kind of overlooked my server for the first 6 hours or so.

Then people started hitting my server.

About 5-6 People downloading at a time, and with DC++ still hashing at 80MB/sec in the background, I was hitting a wall at 80 MB/sec uploading to ethernet. I suspect this was due to the intel PCI Nic, because I got much better performance 100+ MB/sec when using my onboard adapter (realtek) even without jumbo frames enabled.

Overall I would say that my configuration was a great success, being able to handle 5 users heavy sync reads and hashing at the same time. CPU usage was right around 30% all night.

Total files served 3.4TB, thank you zfs.
 
Back
Top