OK, so today I'm thinking that perhaps I may be able to push the core of my 9800 Pro higher if I back down on the memory speed. I think I may be misinterpreting the scant white dots in the 3DMark03 Nature scene (waterfalls always get me) as a core problem rather than a memory problem. (As the core scales up, it pushes the memory harder etc)
So anyway, I'm going to try setting the memory at stock and see how high the core can go.
So my quesiton is what is the general concensus (if there is one) for Radeon 9X00 cards and core vs memory overclock? I have always pushed the memory first to get the most bandwidth for high res and AA but perhaps my thinking is outdated. What do you think?
Furthermore, I have read on a couple web sites that the Radeons were designed to run with synchronous core and memory speeds but this doesn't seem to make sense given that they are not synchronous from the factory.
Thoughts?
So anyway, I'm going to try setting the memory at stock and see how high the core can go.
So my quesiton is what is the general concensus (if there is one) for Radeon 9X00 cards and core vs memory overclock? I have always pushed the memory first to get the most bandwidth for high res and AA but perhaps my thinking is outdated. What do you think?
Furthermore, I have read on a couple web sites that the Radeons were designed to run with synchronous core and memory speeds but this doesn't seem to make sense given that they are not synchronous from the factory.
Thoughts?