R6:Vegas, GoW... what about CoD3?

Zurion

n00b
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
9
I see a bunch of threads on several different site forums about R6: Vegas and GoW, but I don't really see anyone talking about CoD3. Does anybody like this game as much as R6 and GoW for mp? I have GoW... love the coop... but miss having more than 4 players in mp on a team. What's everyones opinions on best MP experience of these 3 games? Anyone have all 3?
 
COD3 single player is one very linear, underwelming and boring piece of s*** game. I got it like last week and I mean, come on. Graphics are a slight improvment over COD2, and you can pick up grenades. Thats where it stops. COD2 looks sharper in my opinion when compared to COD3. In 3 the levels are so linear it like you cant step a cm out of your path, the story is non-existant, makes GOW' s story look complicated. You start out playing as one country then the next level your playing as the French, then you jump to Canada, all without a word being said. Theres no background briefing page like what you got in COD2. You get these long boring cut scenes that you cant skip at all, even if you load a saved game. Enemies keep respawining stupidly and it takes liek one shot to kill them ,but you find yourself killing hundrerds of enemies in one spot till you get tired of their stupid respawing. Especially when clearing buildings. hundreds of soldiers keep on popping out no matter how many you kill, its like the respawning only stops when you get inside the building. Theres only like 3 good levels, nothing inovative. So im guessing multiplayer is nothing new.
 
CoD 3 is just a WWII version of Galaga. German troops come pouring out of the woodwork on predefined paths until you either advance, or some scripted sequence is triggered.

I had moderate fun with it, and it's worth a rental, but it's nothing to get worked up over.
 
If you played one Cod, you played them all. The SP is meh but the MP is awesome imo.

CTF is very fun.
 
Back
Top