I recently got a Koolance EXOS water cooling system with the CPU 300 and GPU 180 blocks, and it's doing its job well. I know it's entry level and noobish, but it's my first time using liquid cooling so I thought it would be a good place to start.
Anyway, the first thing I wanted to do was try out overclocking. Now, I've read a lot of articles about Prescotts and their supposed heat problems, but to be honest I've always been very impressed with the temperatures mine has run, even with air cooling. I had a TT Polo 735 with some Arctic Silver 5 on it before and it ran 35*C idle, load about 47*C. Not too bad considering I'd just come from an Athlon XP 2100+ which ran around 55*C idle and 68*C (with an admittedly crappy heatsink/thermal paste combo). Anyway, my new temps at stock with this Koolance system are 29*C idle, 35*C load. Very nice improvement. So, after doing many overclocking experiments, I've managed the following successfully:
216 FSB, 1:1 DRAM ratio (3.44 GHz) - This yeilded excellent performance and stability, ran Prime95 torture test (blended) for over 9 hours straight with no errors, and also produced noticable gains in my games. I was pretty happy with this, but the temps didn't change at all from stock speeds so I thought I'd push it a little more.
237 FSB, 3:2 DRAM ratio (3.79 GHz) - The load temp after 10 hours of Prime95 torture test (using the in-place large FFT option) was only 41*C. I was very happy about this. However, you'll notice my DRAM ratio was pretty low for DDR400. I figured I could at least get away with a 5:4 ratio here, which was below my RAM's specs. However, anything above 3:2 and my system would barely make it to the Windows loading screen before rebooting.
That brings me to my main question - even though I set the DRAM ratio to 5:4, which runs the RAM at 189.6MHz, which is below its spec of 200 MHz, it wouldn't run until I set it even lower at a 3:2 ratio, where it ran with no issues at all. Of course, the low clock on the ram severely throttled my system performance, making the large CPU overclock fairly worthless. I'm seriously boggled by this, as the RAM performs very well overclocked by 16 MHz, yet can't even boot windows underclocked by 10.4 MHz. Is there something going on here that I'm not aware of? I don't understand why I can't keep my system stable at 3.79, since the temps are fine. As far as voltages, I've got the CPU set to 1.50 and the DRAM is only rated for 2.6 so I tried 2.65 and 2.75, both to no avail. The ram runs fine at up to 2.85 with the first overclock I mentioned. For RAM timings, I have to use 3-4-4-8 or the system won't even POST if the RAM is overclocked, though it's rated to run at 2-3-3-6 at 200 MHz. Any ideas? Sorry about the long-winded post, but I wanted to be specific. Thanks ahead of time!
Edit: for some reason my sig wasn't showing up so here are my system specs:
Pentium 4 Prescott 3.2 GHz | 1 GB PC3200 Corsair XMS RAM
eVGA GeForce 6800 GT | 2x120 GB WD SATA HDDs
Koolance EXOS Liquid Cooling | Antec TruePower 430 PSU
Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS | Asus P4P800-E Deluxe MB
some other stuff that isn't important
Anyway, the first thing I wanted to do was try out overclocking. Now, I've read a lot of articles about Prescotts and their supposed heat problems, but to be honest I've always been very impressed with the temperatures mine has run, even with air cooling. I had a TT Polo 735 with some Arctic Silver 5 on it before and it ran 35*C idle, load about 47*C. Not too bad considering I'd just come from an Athlon XP 2100+ which ran around 55*C idle and 68*C (with an admittedly crappy heatsink/thermal paste combo). Anyway, my new temps at stock with this Koolance system are 29*C idle, 35*C load. Very nice improvement. So, after doing many overclocking experiments, I've managed the following successfully:
216 FSB, 1:1 DRAM ratio (3.44 GHz) - This yeilded excellent performance and stability, ran Prime95 torture test (blended) for over 9 hours straight with no errors, and also produced noticable gains in my games. I was pretty happy with this, but the temps didn't change at all from stock speeds so I thought I'd push it a little more.
237 FSB, 3:2 DRAM ratio (3.79 GHz) - The load temp after 10 hours of Prime95 torture test (using the in-place large FFT option) was only 41*C. I was very happy about this. However, you'll notice my DRAM ratio was pretty low for DDR400. I figured I could at least get away with a 5:4 ratio here, which was below my RAM's specs. However, anything above 3:2 and my system would barely make it to the Windows loading screen before rebooting.
That brings me to my main question - even though I set the DRAM ratio to 5:4, which runs the RAM at 189.6MHz, which is below its spec of 200 MHz, it wouldn't run until I set it even lower at a 3:2 ratio, where it ran with no issues at all. Of course, the low clock on the ram severely throttled my system performance, making the large CPU overclock fairly worthless. I'm seriously boggled by this, as the RAM performs very well overclocked by 16 MHz, yet can't even boot windows underclocked by 10.4 MHz. Is there something going on here that I'm not aware of? I don't understand why I can't keep my system stable at 3.79, since the temps are fine. As far as voltages, I've got the CPU set to 1.50 and the DRAM is only rated for 2.6 so I tried 2.65 and 2.75, both to no avail. The ram runs fine at up to 2.85 with the first overclock I mentioned. For RAM timings, I have to use 3-4-4-8 or the system won't even POST if the RAM is overclocked, though it's rated to run at 2-3-3-6 at 200 MHz. Any ideas? Sorry about the long-winded post, but I wanted to be specific. Thanks ahead of time!
Edit: for some reason my sig wasn't showing up so here are my system specs:
Pentium 4 Prescott 3.2 GHz | 1 GB PC3200 Corsair XMS RAM
eVGA GeForce 6800 GT | 2x120 GB WD SATA HDDs
Koolance EXOS Liquid Cooling | Antec TruePower 430 PSU
Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS | Asus P4P800-E Deluxe MB
some other stuff that isn't important