if it were only that easy.MrGuvernment said:It would be awsome, now for software companies to get off their asses and code for multi-core a hell of alot faster!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if it were only that easy.MrGuvernment said:It would be awsome, now for software companies to get off their asses and code for multi-core a hell of alot faster!
(cf)Eclipse said:regardless of what the temps reported by a cheapass sensor with a cheapass sensor chip on the mobo, the fact remains that intel rates TDP at a sorta idle state. actual power output can be higher than what intel specifies.
amd on the other hand, uses a completely bloated figure that represents the power draw assuming max supported vcore, max supported temp, and something silly like every transistor flipping states at the same time. something we will never hit irl, so the max realworld tdp is lower than the specified tdp.. probably like 75-80% in most cases
and btw, the thermal sensor in K8 is inside the cpu. not out.
drizzt81 said:when that chip comes out, you will need it for AIM, 79 cores to load and run the ads and one for the conversations.
yeah, conroe + 65nm really helped intel on the power output area. i'm curious to see what'll happen with amd's revGSLee said:This is not the case. Arguably, Intel's TDP are more overrated than AMD's now.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/core2duo-shootout/power-2.png
Pkirk618 said:80 cores?
dumb.
Give me a proggy that'll make use of 80 cores let alone 4 or even the rare proggies for 2 cores. Fuckers--I don't give a shit about that.
Now where's my dog
MrGuvernment said:And at the time Intel and people thought 10GHZ had no boundaries either.... and it would be a piece of cake - but look! they ran into boundaries, same applies here. One cant say what limitations they may run into, or new problems that will come up.
It would be awsome, now for software companies to get off their asses and code for multi-core a hell of alot faster!
and i wouldnt care if my cpu was the size of an x1900XT, to have 80 cores on it ?
everyone wants everything to be microscopic, if i can get that many cores, i dont care if the cpu is the size of a mid tower case!
Enduring_Warrior said:I liked what you say because it hits on common sense... But anyways the trends are to go mobile and for that you need to.... shrink shrink shrink. and about the 10 Ghz blame intel's MArchitecture.