• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Q9400 or X3210?

R

rjolin01

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
1,399
Just looking for some opinions as to which is the better. My current Q9400 or a X3210? Would appreciate reasoning also.
 
The X3210 is 65nm, runs a lot hotter, same low multiplier, and slower stock speed + 1066 FSB. You'd be better off sticking with the q9400.
 
While I loved my X3210 (which did not run much hotter), I would stick with your Q9400 - newer tech, etc.
 
Only advantage for the Xeon is 1MB extra cache per core pair (2MB more total), but at the lower clock speed and FSB it won't make up for the slower performance.
 
Q9400 that cant even reach 3.5GHZ or a X3210 that can hit 4GHZ. And he does intend to oc it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top