• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Project 7125

J

jebo_4jc

[H]ard|DCer of the Month - April 2011
2FA
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
14,572
This popped up on my Q6600.

I'm using the old (6.30 I guess) client. It downloaded a new version of FahCore_A3.exe (huh?) then started banging away on this thing. Says it's gromacs core 2.27

I'll try to get PPD numbers up. So far I'm seeing about 7 mins TPF at 3.2ghz.
 
Last edited:
Nice. HFM reports 6,200 PPD. This box only gets about 5,000 PPD on 6071 etc units and only about 3,500-4,000 PPD on 6701s. That's while pushing two GTX460s. This looks like a nice WU.
 
jebo_4jc said:
Nice. HFM reports 6,200 PPD. This box only gets about 5,000 PPD on 6071 etc units and only about 3,500-4,000 PPD on 6701s. That's while pushing two GTX460s. This looks like a nice WU.
Click to expand...

Sounds good, nothing on psummary yet about them although there were a whole buch of new projects on there the other day:confused:

It'll be interesting to see what my x6 gets on them.
 
Interesting. Thanks for the heads up, Jebo. I only have one standard SMP client and it DL a P6701 earlier today but my core is still v2.22.
 
My i5 2400 (3.2ghz) HTPC picked up a 7124. It's showing 12,500 ppd. I don't have access to the HFM benchmark info at the moment, but I recall that CPU gets about 9000 PPD on a 6701 and around 11,000 PPD on a 60xx.

I edited the thread title to include the 7124, but I doubt it will show. If a mod happens to see this go for it.
 
C2D E6750 @ 3.0 GHz (I throw what I can at F@H .... ain't much but it works :D)

HFM showing 14:00 TPF/2200 ppd
 
7127 gets me 18,878 ppd
- Xeon X3440 3.76GHz (19x198) DDR3-1580mhz (11-11-11-30-2T?!?!? I could have sworn I was at 9,9,9,24)
- also running a GTX 460 at 850mhz running a 6800

I get 19,371ppd on a 2684 so I don't mind SMP like this at all.
 
just picked up a 7107, no PPD estimate (HFM hasnt updated in a while), but TPF of 4:00 , with only 3.5 ghz clock speed(i need to speed this biotch back up so i can get better times :D)
 
W.Feather said:
just picked up a 7107, no PPD estimate (HFM hasnt updated in a while), but TPF of 4:00 , with only 3.5 ghz clock speed(i need to speed this biotch back up so i can get better times :D)
Click to expand...


manually update it..

tools/download projects from stanford

but doesn't look like the WU's have been added..

http://fah-web.stanford.edu/psummary.html (url for where HFM downloads the information)
 
yup, i did that, didnt get info yet

liking the time frames, especially since i'm on a lower clock speed than normal..
 
eww. Got a couple other new WU:

P10113 / i5 2400 / 3.2ghz / 20:05 tpf / 7,500 PPD

P10114 / Q6600 / 3.2ghz / 31:38 tpf / 3,800 PPD

Looks like these bastards are the new 6701s :mad:
 
lets see what my 1090T pulls for them, when i eventually get one :D
 
jebo_4jc said:
eww. Got a couple other new WU:

P10113 / i5 2400 / 3.2ghz / 20:05 tpf / 7,500 PPD

P10114 / Q6600 / 3.2ghz / 31:38 tpf / 3,800 PPD

Looks like these bastards are the new 6701s :mad:
Click to expand...
Same old song and dance from PG. The more things change the more they stay the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top