• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Prime95x64 - diagnosing failure?

Katalysis

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
1,813
I'm in the process of OCing my first intel CPU ever, a Q6600 (yes, I've read the guide :) ), and I've just been in the process of bumping up the vcore and running Prime for stressing (all my other voltages are on auto, but the VTT is at 1.3, CPU at 1.33).

My question is, what should I be noting about the way Prime fails to help me determine what to change? I haven't done a Prime run on all voltage auto, but the system posted and ran fine after just tweking the FSB and multi. Now, when I started changing the CPU voltage, I am getting the same response from Prime: the same core fails, but it lasts longer each time I bump the CPU voltage (the rest of the cores chug along fine).

Does this scream "more ___ volts," or is it just going to be trial and error? I haven't messed with the NB, SB, or RAM volts, simply because I am putting two more case fans in tonight before I do. Prime temps were fine with 8x400 until failure, highest core was 51C with the S1284 and stock Antec 300 cooling, so I'm not sure what my next step should be. I know each CPU is different, but I see people with these voltages over a point lower than mine, and want to make sure I'm not wasting my efforts when something else is the culprit.

And one quick question -- is there any voltage or temp difference by running the same clock speed but with lower multi / higher FSB (and vice-versa)?

Any help appreciated!
 
So should I just keep upping the CPU voltage until it is stable, and then start raising the others while lowering the CPU voltage?

I think I'm going back to a 9 multiplier and starting the entire process over. I'll see if I can get it to post with 9x400 one time, then go back to stock and work forward.
 
Back
Top