Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Vengance_01 said:If your gonna spend that much, get the 6300. All ES samples seem to hit 3GHZ on stock voltageAt 183$ is will become the best Dual Core on the market for buget gamers imo.
surazal said:I think the question is if you are buying a whole new system or just upgrading the processor. If you are looking to build a new budget dual core system, I don't think it makes sense to get a PD 805 after conroe launches. If you already own a system and want a drop-in replacement cpu, ignore the rest of what I have to say.
The E6300 conroe might be $183, but performance wise, you'll need to overclock the 805 to match it. Likewise, the 915 also is a bad choice after conroe launches. You have to consider the other costs associated with the 805. It runs hotter, especially if you plan on OCing it, which means you'll want a 3rd party heatsink. The 805 has higher power requirements (reaches ridiculous levels when OCed) so you'll need a stronger PSU. And, you might not want your computer functioning as a heater.
My advice is to take the whole system into consideration, not just the cost of a cpu.
benutne said:Spending $183 != Spending $93. Theres a difference of $90 there that could go someplace else. Even compared to the 915D theres still a difference of $50.
I may grab that 915D though...I dunno. We'll have to see how impatient I get when the student loans come in tomorrow.
cupholder2.0 said:Are you aware of the power which Conroe possesses?![]()
benutne said:I am aware of the power which Conroe possesses. I am also aware of the power my pissed off wife possesses, and let me assure you, Conroe does not hold even the smallest candle to that.
Right now, I just can't justify spending $183 on a CPU, no matter how fast it will be. My money is better spent on something that will go up in value like my home.
Can you OC the D915 to 4 ghz? If not then the 805 still is better.pxc said:July 23 price list: http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1029529307&postcount=3
IMO, the D 915 ($133) will be worth the extra $40 over the D 805 ($93). It runs much cooler and has more cache. Both are "95W" TDP, but in real testing the C1 D 900 series chips use noticeably less power than Smithfield. And that should also apply to overclocked.
benutne said:I am aware of the power which Conroe possesses. I am also aware of the power my pissed off wife possesses, and let me assure you, Conroe does not hold even the smallest candle to that.
Right now, I just can't justify spending $183 on a CPU, no matter how fast it will be. My money is better spent on something that will go up in value like my home.
stormshadow said:I'm not an Intel guy but after reading the THG article, you're telling me that a soon-to-be $93 processor can be oc'd to 4Ghz stable?
![]()
time for me to convert ???
It should have a much better chance to hit 4GHz on average than the D 805. All D 915 and D 945 chips are at least C1 stepping and C1 stepping Presler CPUs are 1337. They run much cooler than Smithfield CPUs even with the same platform rating (e.g. 95W or 130W).Kanaric said:Can you OC the D915 to 4 ghz? If not then the 805 still is better.
Hmm, if this is true then i'll get the 915 instead.pxc said:It should have a much better chance to hit 4GHz on average than the D 805. All D 915 and D 945 chips are at least C1 stepping and C1 stepping Presler CPUs are 1337. They run much cooler than Smithfield CPUs even with the same platform rating (e.g. 95W or 130W).
There is little to want about a Smithfield core (90nm, higher voltage, less cache) other than the cheap price. Presler is better in virtually every way. That's why I said above that the D 915 is worth the extra $40.
The 965XE was the first C1 core Presler. Check out the system load power consumption charts vs the older steppings here:Kanaric said:Hmm, if this is true then i'll get the 915 instead.