TheDrag0nReb0rn
n00b
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2006
- Messages
- 55
On newegg.com, the Sapphire X1800XT 512mb costs over $50 more than the eVGA GeForce 7900 KO. I'm on a budget. Would it be smarter for me to buy the 7900?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TheDrag0nReb0rn said:On newegg.com, the Sapphire X1800XT 512mb costs over $50 more than the eVGA GeForce 7900 KO. I'm on a budget. Would it be smarter for me to buy the 7900?
defaultluser said:No, it would be SMARTER of you to learn how to comparison-shop properly, and find the 256MB version. You don't need the 512MB version of the x1800 XT, the 256MB version is competitive with the 7900 GT.
StealthyFish said:lol. if you want to take the risk, go out and buy the HIS X1800GTO. 100% unlockable to X1800XL//XT if you need it. now that's budget. 200 dollars - a 30 dollar rebate. 300 dollars isn't budget dude.
TheDrag0nReb0rn said:I've already done looked at both and made some posts on the forums, and people have said the X1800XT sucks if it doesn't have the 512mb. They're wrong?
defaultluser said:You were about to buy a 256MB 7900 GT. Does it suck because it only has 256MB? Or, perhaps it magically make better use of the 256MB than an x1800 XT?
There's not a single game out that uses more than 256MB with texture compression turned on. And trust me, you won't notice the compression (Just look at Doom 3: HQ and Ultra look exactly the same). In fact, there are a LOT of games where you CAN'T turn it off.
The memory is the same speed, there's just half as much. Unfortunately, you're going to have to take my word for it, because there are ZERO reviews comparing the two.