Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ViDA said:Well , its quite cheesy to say the least , plus latest 939 pin AMD's generate not a whole less heat than the prescots. And this is not coming from an intel fan.
Cheers.
Ardrid said:I had to register just for this comment. You clearly have not done your research and are going on unsubstantiated rumors. Well, allow me to rectify this. Socket 939 processors have a TDP (read: max dissipation) of 89W. Current top the line processors aren't even near that figure during actual use. That's the same amount of power consumed by Socket 754 and Socket 940 processors. Conversely, Prescotts have a TDP (read: average dissipation) of 103W and it's only going to go up from there.
As far as this kit goes, I think it completely owns. If you find out who made it, be sure to let us know Kyle.
Frustration said:Look for one on eBay or something.
LOL yeah right. How does dual core Prescotts blow up your skirt?PhyberOptik said:To be honest, I think this was a very cheeky tactic on AMD's part, rest assured that Intel's retaliation will be swift and brutal.
gordon151 said:The Athlon 64 Survival Kit should include prosthetic limb replacements for the arm and leg you'll be giving up in order to buy one.
[AKA]StraferX said:I was suprised to not see a 25ft section of flexible duct work which could be connected...
Nasty_Savage said:Lol. That just made my dreary day! You can probably slip an Apple G5 innuendo or two in that kit too for a double whammy. Maybe a welders mask since they have brought in liquid cooling <--And this coming from an Apple fan
Stay tuned for our review of the Apple PowerMac G5 2.5GHz Survival Kit. It includes a wetsuit, squeegee, special waterproof turtleneck, and a one use disposable time machine to the year 1984.
Sarkee said:That would go with the roll of toilet paper Kyle has on his desk...(visible in ovenmitt picture)...Must be West Texas...
Houston, we have a fanboi.T8000 said:HEAT OUTPUT
The Athlon 64 has about 90W thermal output at 2,4 Ghz versus about 100W for Prescott at 3,4 Ghz, so I would guess an Athlon 64 at 3,4 Ghz would have a (90/2,4*3,4) 127,5W thermal output.
COOLING FANS
Most coolers worth buying support both Prescott and Athlon 64/FX, so they sound the same.
NX TECHNOLOGY
Will stop about 1% of the current viruses, so couple that with the lack of stability from most Athlon systems, and Prescott may be even safer for your data.
64 BIT EXTENSIONS
Not supported yet, unlike SSE 2 & 3 and HT
HEATSINK FAILURE
All P4 CPU's will step back when they get above 90 degrees Celsius, allowing you to save your data, while Athlon will burn to death, or shut down at once, when your mainbord supports it, loosing your data and sometimes more.
CrimandEvil said:LOL yeah right. How does dual core Prescotts blow up your skirt?
T8000 said:HEAT OUTPUT
The Athlon 64 has about 90W thermal output at 2,4 Ghz versus about 100W for Prescott at 3,4 Ghz, so I would guess an Athlon 64 at 3,4 Ghz would have a (90/2,4*3,4) 127,5W thermal output.
TekieB said:Yes, but what beats that prescott in performance at lesser heat output?
M4d-K10wN said:A Northwood?