Post Your GPU-Z!

Still not brave enough to upgrade to Vista? Don't blame you.

I decided there are too many "older" progs I like that XP 32 covers and Vista collides with. XP for now with room to grow in the future...(Vista 64-bit).
;)
 
8800GPUz.jpg


Rig in Sig.
 
3850 Crossfire, overclocked max stable in Crysis with factory cooling.

gpuz-oc.jpg
 
Hey does anyone know here if when it says crossfire is enabled, that it is 100% sure that it is enabled? I ask, because the only place in the CCC that recognizes the second card is in the overdrive menu, so even though it gives me the crossfire option in CCC and I have it enabled I am trying to verify it is working in crossfire.

I verified it with 3D Mark
 
I checked 3dmark06 and it does not recognize the second card. It tells me I have 1/1 graphic cards. Although it picks up both HD Audio controllers on each of my two cards, so I am not sure.
 
Yea I did, i got 10111 with crossfire enabled, and 11192 with it disabled. So something is not right.
 
8500yw9.gif


it kinda sucks, but the most graphically intensive game i play is fifa08. The 8500gt does fine. :eek:
 
I figure, why not post both?

All stock clocks. Boring. Seems like there's a lot more Crossfires than SLIs in this thread. So I'll represent the SLI crowd. :D

zs.jpg
 
um.. 666mhz?? :eek: :rolleyes: its a mutated evil 8800gts!! ahh!! :) lol.. but why 666? cant u do like 667 or 665?? :p

Actually Rivatuner reads it as 674. Never thought about it actually :p When testing in Rivatuner and ATITool artifact scanner, I just went with the lowest number before artifacting. So from 666-674 was read in the resource monitor as 674. The next jump was to 681. Funny though...never paid attention to the number I ended up with. This card's a beast :eek::p

I can get into the 680+ range, but it starts artifacting once the GPU gets over 72c. I think if I watercooled it I could probably hit 700 on it before juicing the voltage on it.
 
Actually Rivatuner reads it as 674. Never thought about it actually :p When testing in Rivatuner and ATITool artifact scanner, I just went with the lowest number before artifacting. So from 666-674 was read in the resource monitor as 674. The next jump was to 681. Funny though...never paid attention to the number I ended up with. This card's a beast :eek::p

I can get into the 680+ range, but it starts artifacting once the GPU gets over 72c. I think if I watercooled it I could probably hit 700 on it before juicing the voltage on it.

You can hit 700 on it. since you have the A3 chip. :eek:
 
I'm not proud of my x1650pro so I'm not even gonna post it.

I've built nice machines for people before.. Radeon 9800pro, Geforce 6800, x800pro... I need to buy something nice for myself some time!

I got an old RIVA TNT2 vanta in the basement... you think that program would work?

Got an old Diamond Stealth III card too... hell even a Mach 32 somewhere...
 
I want to see some oldie non-nVidia or ATI video cards (if they're supported by GPU-Z)
 



I don't believe in 1920x1200 CPU bottlenecks! 80+ FPS in Oblivion with everything maxed and 8xaa at 1920x1200!
 
What if I installed my geforce 4 mx 440 agp8x would anybody like to see what it gets?
 
x850xtPEGPU-Z.jpg


Starting to get annoyed with this card and wanting a better one but holding out for a high end HD 3xxx card.
 
x850xtPEGPU-Z.jpg


Starting to get annoyed with this card and wanting a better one but holding out for a high end HD 3xxx card.

I still use an x800XL on my downstairs pc.Still using agp slot, it can't do much than play CS:S, some battlefield 2, Optimized Oblivion and even some FSX. The x8xx series were very good back in 2005 I still have the retail box.
 
Heres my 7800GTX...Why is my bandwith so high ?!?!?!

..Thats higher then some of the 8800s on here !

1078968.jpg
 
Here is mine.

I guess maybe I should update my drivers. I will post a new screen shot with the newer drivers.



now with updated drivers

 
Heres my 7800GTX...Why is my bandwith so high ?!?!?!

..Thats higher then some of the 8800s on here !

1078968.jpg

Is your RAM really running at 2620MHz? That would be why the bandwidth is so high. GPU-z doesn't actually check the bandwidth, it uses a simple formula based on the bus width and memory frequency.
 
Holy crap thats an ridiculously huge over clock on that memory.. Either you did overclock it that high or the GPU-Z not flawless yet.

In GPU-Z 0.1.0 my card was saying I had SM 9.0.... Upgraded to 0.1.1 it now say 9.0 / SM 2.0.
 
Back
Top