Which would be better?
Getting an E6400 and overclocking to 400mhz FSB 1:1 memory on the ds3
OR
Getting and E6600 and possibly not being able to overclock the FSB up to 400mhz and therefore underclocking memory at 1:1.
I am building a rig for strictly hardcore gaming with a 7950gx2. From what I have read OCing an E6400 to fsb 400mhz is a cakewalk. Would I get better performance with this in gaming?
Or should I risk getting an E6600 and hoping to hit 400FSB. My concern is that if I cannot run at 400mhz fsb then my memory frequency will be screwey(say I can only OC to 340FSB then my memory will only be 680mhz and my proc will be only at 3ghz anyway..
What do you guys think? Should I just get an e6400 or stick to my guns and get an e6600? I am looking strictly for the best 24/7 gaming performance I can get and will be stuck with this decision for several years.
Please chime in!
Getting an E6400 and overclocking to 400mhz FSB 1:1 memory on the ds3
OR
Getting and E6600 and possibly not being able to overclock the FSB up to 400mhz and therefore underclocking memory at 1:1.
I am building a rig for strictly hardcore gaming with a 7950gx2. From what I have read OCing an E6400 to fsb 400mhz is a cakewalk. Would I get better performance with this in gaming?
Or should I risk getting an E6600 and hoping to hit 400FSB. My concern is that if I cannot run at 400mhz fsb then my memory frequency will be screwey(say I can only OC to 340FSB then my memory will only be 680mhz and my proc will be only at 3ghz anyway..
What do you guys think? Should I just get an e6400 or stick to my guns and get an e6600? I am looking strictly for the best 24/7 gaming performance I can get and will be stuck with this decision for several years.
Please chime in!