Piracy Problem? Block the Entire App Store

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by rgMekanic, Apr 18, 2018.

  1. rgMekanic

    rgMekanic [H]ard|News Staff Member

    Messages:
    3,725
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Apps that enable users to watch IPTV services are nothing new. However now BGR is reporting that two Australian media companies are looking to reduce the use of paid pirate IPTV boxes, not by going after the manufacturers or sellers, but by shutting down the app stores that they use. The stores are an alternative to the Google Play store, and provide APKs for all sorts of legitimate Android apps, however a Hong Kong based TV firm and Roadshow Films don't seem to care.

    Sweeping legislation like this could be a very slippery slope. Only time will tell if this gets passed, and if it does, what ramifications it will end up having.

    The company acknowledged that many of those marketplaces, which are somewhat akin to the Play marketplace offered by Google for Android devices, contain apps that aren’t specifically focused on copyright infringement — for example, Netflix and YouTube apps.

    However, the company argues that the primary purpose of the marketplaces is to facilitate copyright infringement and that the non-infringing apps can be downloaded elsewhere.
     
    Bielzebuddha likes this.
  2. Bielzebuddha

    Bielzebuddha [H]Lite

    Messages:
    67
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2018
    Instead of making it easier and cheaper for people to access content (and likely triple their profits), they prop their foot on the desk & take aim with a shotgun...
     
    Revdarian and rgMekanic like this.
  3. sfsuphysics

    sfsuphysics I don't get it

    Messages:
    13,668
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Gotta say the whole "oh no people are watch TV for free" level of "piracy" really ranks low on my whole Give-a-shitometer. Slightly more for premium pay channels like HBO and absolutely zero fucks given for OTA channels
     
    Revdarian likes this.
  4. Ur_Mom

    Ur_Mom I'm Not Serious

    Messages:
    19,606
    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    This is good for those "legitimate" app stores - Google, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon. There have been piracy based apps on those stores in the past (and probably now). So, I'd assume that if one gets through the filters and is on the app store, it's fair game to get the Google/Apple/etc. store shut down as it'd have a bad app?

    Good intentions, real shitty approach.
     
  5. velusip

    velusip [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,577
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Stepping over legal process and business rights has become common practice for media/broadcasting groups these days.
     
    Revdarian likes this.
  6. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,394
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    I am conflicted on this, if the store follows due diligence on being ledigimate and tries to keep its content on the up and up then this is bad. If however if some 80% of the content is pirated/illegal and they scoff at take down requests then they aren’t even trying to pretend to be an actual store.

    At least if they pretend to give a shit offer some lip service and take down the pirated stuff after they “investigate” the issue then they are at least putting up a front. I mean if it takes a month to “investigate” and the other party has had enough time to change their name so hey can immediately re upload then so be it. At least they took down the reported infringed content.
     
    Revdarian and Ur_Mom like this.
  7. Kdawg

    Kdawg Gawd

    Messages:
    935
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2017
    hooker problem?
    block backpage and the entire internet.
     
  8. Dekoth-E-

    Dekoth-E- [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,600
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Ever watched Pirated TV? It is incredibly shitty quality..Honestly it in itself should be considered a punishment.
     
    rgMekanic likes this.
  9. velusip

    velusip [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,577
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    When Fairplay Canada filed a request to the CRTC for control over website takedowns and enhancing internet censorship in the context of illegal video streaming services (non-copyright holders), I filed against the request citing a similar opinion. e.g. If your video delivery service is so bad that your competition is a sketchy website with popup ads, javascript crypto miners, terrible video quality, and hit or miss greasemonkey scripts, then you truly never had any claim to the projected profit losses which you are using to justify this legislative meddling.

    Any further investment in this project to control the internet in the name of protecting whatever terrible service you have is nothing more than anti-capitalism. Instead, re-invest in your own industry and infrastructure and rise above the illegal competition as if they were irrelevant, and they will become irrelevant.
     
    Revdarian likes this.
  10. NeghVar

    NeghVar 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,442
    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Kill the patient. Cure the disease
     
  11. Tekara

    Tekara [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,007
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    You say the Great Firewall of China can't be topped? Hold my Fosters!