[Sorry guys, pics removed (Bad_Boy doesnt want to get himself or [H] into any trouble)]

orginal thread: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=27119
orginal thread: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=27119
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by chuckm1020
reading the specifications, the memory clock says 600mhz. seems kinda low for nvidia, since the 5950 is at 950mhz. maybe its slow because of the gddr3![]()
Originally posted by aces170
That's a decent article, but I feel the person is somewhat biased towards Nvidia.
Observe all copyright laws when posting copyrighted material.
If the material belongs to someone else, credit the original author.
Originally posted by creedAMD
Here's a link to the article.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=27119
Might want to put it in the first post badboy.
Originally posted by creedAMD
Here's a link to the article.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=27119
Might want to put it in the first post badboy.
Originally posted by saqdeez
wow this thread serves no purpose. Thanks for nothing
ZenOps:
Nvidia's AF is not superior, it is more accurate. Being more accurate alone does not make it superior though.
ATi's AF allows for further levels of AF will less performance hit, 16X is standard but I have heard that it goes all the way to 256X (but ATi will not let users select this setting as it would really slow things down)
This is an approximation: ATi at 16x is just as accurate as Nvidia at 8x at certain angles (like 45 and 90 degrees) at other angles, ATi is better. However, Ati is faster even with the greater depth.
ATi at 8x compared to Nvidia at 8x, Nvidia is more accurate at all angles, ATi is only accurate at some angles.
The NV40 is superior in technology in a couple ways for sure:
With FP32 support. It is also superior with Pixel and Vertex 3.0 support.
By contrast ATi only has FP24 and pixel and vertex 2.0 (with a few 3.0 thrown in)
I would think that an image rendered with Nvidia's "might use" hybrid FP32 for closeup textures with FP16 for faraway, and maybe the sky at INT12 would look better and be much faster than a full screen FP24 that DX9 and ATi use.
There is no need for a texture that might be the rendered equivalent of a few miles away to be rendered in FP24. At that range INT12 should be adequate, and would probably boost peformance quite a bit. Its the same idea as using less polygons on character models that are only a few pixels high, really far away.
As for how long it will take to see these games... Well, honestly it might take a while. UT2004 is still pretty well DX7. Pixel and vertex 3.0 has promise, but most videocards still have the vast majority of die space dedicated to speedy fixed function calculations.
Originally posted by defiant
uhm 600 ddr mhz=1200mhz sdr
Looks like one magazine has released a preview of the GeForce 6800 video card from nVidia. If you happenedly own a subscription you probably have received the magazine. For those who buy it in news stands I think still has to wait a couple of days. For those who don't want to pay $7.99 for a fricken ad riddled magazine LiquidX has scanned the 4 page article on the GeForce 6800 video card from nVidia. What I liked seeing was the "Dual DVI". If the Radeon X800 doesn't come standard as Dual DVI then the nVidia card is on my purchase block.
Here is a .zip package of the 4 page article cropped and sharpened:
- GeForce 6800 Article
Isn't GDDR-3 Quad-pumped? If so then, it's 600x4=2400MHz sdram. If GDDR-3 isn't quad pumped, what's the point of the double latency then? It just makes things a LOT worse for unpredictable redres, such as games.uhm 600 ddr mhz=1200mhz sdr
Originally posted by Bad_Boy
By the way:
Liquid....your starting to make some news
http://www.3dchipset.com/
Originally posted by jamezzz122
Where is my damn MaximumPC issue...My damn subscription is always late...
Originally posted by VIOLENCE FACTOR
You dorks waste so much of your lives bitching over hardware it amazes me. And be4 you quirp in with a 'well your post is just as bad', it took me 20 seconds to type this. I'll sacrafice 20 seconds to tell you the truth.
Originally posted by Bad_Boy
and ill waste 15 secs on you to tell you
your post doesnt mean anything either
its a forum, get over it.
Originally posted by Visable-assassin
so why are you even posting in here...other than to bitch?