• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Per core overclocking?

M

m2h

Limp Gawd
Joined
Mar 23, 2004
Messages
281
Does anyone bother with per core overclocking? I wish reviews did it. I understand I could get some minor higher clocks on on the 1st and 2nd core. Currently I'm at 4.6ghz ( i5-4690K ) only all 4 cores. Intel by default all ready sets each core at different clocks, from higher to lower based on how many cores are active.
 
Last edited:
For most people the performance increase is minimal for the work required to tailor the overclock. Not to mention many boards do not support this set of features. Its more of a niche.
 
I'm pretty sure 'per sore' OCing is a misleading name. It is supposed to be for when other cores are disabled.

So "Core 1" OC is actually "3 cores inactive" OC, which means this OC only takes place when 3 cores are parked and q core is active, with enough load to merrit a boost, 'Core 2' is when 2 cores are active, 2 are inactive... etc.
 
Ok thank you, and the clarification. I won't bother. Purely curiosity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top