- Joined
- Jul 11, 2001
- Messages
- 12,831
I'm piecing together a computer out of spare parts that will be used for light office duty. It's come down to these two CPUs, but there is disagreement as to which one will be better.
The Celeron 430 is based on the Core architecture, but it is single-core and only 1.8Ghz.
The Pentium D 840 is basically a dual-core Pentium 4, but the clockspeed is much faster at 3.2Ghz
I feel that the Pentium D 840 would be better for most situations. This is because I notice many programs or tasks, even background tasks like Anti-Virus can now easily peg a single core at 100%. Having a 2nd core to work with, even if each one is slower individually, should be better in the end. The 3.2Ghz vs 1.8Ghz clockspeed difference should also make up at least a bit of the IPC difference between the architectures. Can anyone think of a reason the 430 might be better aside from heat and power consumption?
The Celeron 430 is based on the Core architecture, but it is single-core and only 1.8Ghz.
The Pentium D 840 is basically a dual-core Pentium 4, but the clockspeed is much faster at 3.2Ghz
I feel that the Pentium D 840 would be better for most situations. This is because I notice many programs or tasks, even background tasks like Anti-Virus can now easily peg a single core at 100%. Having a 2nd core to work with, even if each one is slower individually, should be better in the end. The 3.2Ghz vs 1.8Ghz clockspeed difference should also make up at least a bit of the IPC difference between the architectures. Can anyone think of a reason the 430 might be better aside from heat and power consumption?