• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

P4 at 5+GHz!

O

ocphangaz

Gawd
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
707
now the question is... they ONLY manage to OC from 200FSB to lame lame 309FSB on LN2! i did mine at 315FSB on air and run it as unstable as tom's :D

another thing... he's using procs that aren't available in the market... it's like using current 2.4C and OCed it to 3.6GHZ and compared it with technologies 2 years ago (P3 era about P3 800Mhz)
 
Originally posted by ocphangaz
now the question is... they ONLY manage to OC from 200FSB to lame lame 309FSB on LN2! i did mine at 315FSB on air and run it as unstable as tom's :D

another thing... he's using procs that aren't available in the market... it's like using current 2.4C and OCed it to 3.6GHZ and compared it with technologies 2 years ago (P3 era about P3 800Mhz)
Click to expand...

You suck at compairing anything.

First of all 309 fsb isnt shabby, definatly not lame.. and I dont think they were going for "ultra high fsb"


And its not like comparing a 2.4c with a p3 800 2 years ago, more like comparing an 800 p3 to an 866 ES thats going to be out in 3 months.:rolleyes:

Man some people really complain and argue about the stupidest shit, I admit it was semi impressed seeing another p4 @ 5+gig... Although I am not overly impressed because of how unstable it was.
 
the thing is that jap overclockers do stuff but then they write about it in japanese and all of us are like Huh then some dude who can write in english does it and we give them an award for being first ...
 
Originally posted by Big Worm
You suck at compairing anything.

First of all 309 fsb isnt shabby, definatly not lame.. and I dont think they were going for "ultra high fsb"


And its not like comparing a 2.4c with a p3 800 2 years ago, more like comparing an 800 p3 to an 866 ES thats going to be out in 3 months.:rolleyes:

Man some people really complain and argue about the stupidest shit, I admit it was semi impressed seeing another p4 @ 5+gig... Although I am not overly impressed because of how unstable it was.
Click to expand...

Wasn't it an 866 EB? :D
 
Originally posted by 1nferno
Wasn't it an 866 EB? :D
Click to expand...

Yeah but I am talking about engineering sample, aka "ES".


"Man some people really complain and argue about the stupidest shit, " :p :D
 
wow, oh wait not really impressed, so they got it to boot at 5+ghz what about sandra tests, or mem tests, 3dmark scores. I mean with all that work and nothing but a little video to show for it. Waste of bandwidth to me.
 
Tom's, as usual is masturbating onto the router and seeing who's willing to pay for a sample of their spooge.

Bought, sold and shuffled shit.

Anyone who believes it or puts any value into it is getting _precisely_ what they deserve.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top