BobSutan
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2000
- Messages
- 12,226
I'm brushing up on OSPF and came across something I could use some explaining with.
In regards to routers that have bidirectional communication (both in the 2WAY state), when referring to routers that are in the exchange process and about to begin the EXSTART state, would it be true to term said routers as Master/Slave, or are we simply talking about DR/BDRs and the author decided to just use different terminology? (This is largely like DR/BDR behavior since the router with the highest Router ID will begin the sending of the DBDs.)
In short, I'm confused as to why the authors choose the Master/Slave terminology for the EXSTART state.
Note: the book I'm referencing is CCNP:2.0 Routing by Robert N. Myhre
In regards to routers that have bidirectional communication (both in the 2WAY state), when referring to routers that are in the exchange process and about to begin the EXSTART state, would it be true to term said routers as Master/Slave, or are we simply talking about DR/BDRs and the author decided to just use different terminology? (This is largely like DR/BDR behavior since the router with the highest Router ID will begin the sending of the DBDs.)
In short, I'm confused as to why the authors choose the Master/Slave terminology for the EXSTART state.
Note: the book I'm referencing is CCNP:2.0 Routing by Robert N. Myhre