"Mistaken Delivery" isn't defined in the TX code, all it says is
The statute is certainly open to some interpretation, but I also think it's clearly intended to be a consumer protection statute, not a consumer payday statute. Assuming TX law even governed (who knows what state this happened in?), Best Buy would not have a difficult time proving there was a mistake considering the customer plastered evidence on the internet. All they'd need to do is produce a record of the sales.
Pretend you have a small business and you accidentally mail a customer more products than they actually paid for; can you see where you might interpret look at things differently?
A person who receives unsolicited goods as the result of a bona fide mistake shall return the goods.
The statute is certainly open to some interpretation, but I also think it's clearly intended to be a consumer protection statute, not a consumer payday statute. Assuming TX law even governed (who knows what state this happened in?), Best Buy would not have a difficult time proving there was a mistake considering the customer plastered evidence on the internet. All they'd need to do is produce a record of the sales.
Pretend you have a small business and you accidentally mail a customer more products than they actually paid for; can you see where you might interpret look at things differently?
Read it again. First, the burden of proof is on the sender to prove it was a mistake, and that only applies for "Mistaken Delivery", which is generally defined as a product delivered to the wrong address/recipient.
Unless the other 4 ipads were to delivered to 4 other people and Best Buy can prove it, the recipient is legally entitled to keep them as "gifts".