Liquidkristal
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2000
- Messages
- 5,075
We have a new client who has a 100Mbit WAN (Checked with telco, they say it is 100Mbit as well) between sites. However the performance is not right, 25 minutes to copy 2.8GB (so about 20Mbit give or take)
The hardware on each end is a HP1800-48 series switch with about 20 users on each end.
If I ping a printer in Site B from Site A I get steady <1ms pings, if I ping either switch its all over the place, (between 1ms and 700ms) either locally or remotely.
The whole thing is setup on 1 subnet as well (which can't be helping), the plan is to route the whole thing, now Cisco's website is not the most helpful, I was looking at the small routers with FE WAN ports, like say the 867VAE, the only mentions of routed throughput seem to be very low (it supports VDSL2 so I would expect 100Mbit throughput), or would we be better going with L3 Switches on each end to give each site a seperate subnet and route between them
The hardware on each end is a HP1800-48 series switch with about 20 users on each end.
If I ping a printer in Site B from Site A I get steady <1ms pings, if I ping either switch its all over the place, (between 1ms and 700ms) either locally or remotely.
The whole thing is setup on 1 subnet as well (which can't be helping), the plan is to route the whole thing, now Cisco's website is not the most helpful, I was looking at the small routers with FE WAN ports, like say the 867VAE, the only mentions of routed throughput seem to be very low (it supports VDSL2 so I would expect 100Mbit throughput), or would we be better going with L3 Switches on each end to give each site a seperate subnet and route between them