I hope they license multi-texturing.
lol stupid 3dfx and its Waterloo.
Say what you will about 3DFX but they had some of the best commercials.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldiYYJNnQUk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope they license multi-texturing.
lol stupid 3dfx and its Waterloo.
Seriously, I am not a fanboy by any means, but Nvidia is clearly the better choice atm. Didn't Kyle and them do a review of a 670 vs 7970 and the 670 beat it in almost every test? Found it.
I have been looking at a 770, but I have to have a Nvidia card since I primarily live on Linux.
The 7970 wasn't cheaper for quite awhile later, and even then it took pre-oc'd cards to beat the GTX 680 finally ("ghz edition") which cost roughly the same again initially. The 770 has now replaced the 680, so I'm not sure why you refer to the 680 "being more" when the 770 is actually lower MSRP than the 7970 while being faster again now. Add in better drivers overall, more features (physx, txaa, driver-level ssao), working multi-card support (stutter-fest CrossFire = no!, slow driver updates for games for CrossFire = no!) and it's little wonder the GTX 670 alone sold more than the Radeon 7970 and 7950 combined (in fact I think around double from the older Steam Survey stats trends). Radeons are viewed as budget products now, not premium offerings for obvious reasons. That's unfortunate and hopefully will change back around soon because more competition = better cards at lower prices for consumers .
Nvidia's days of relying on discrete GPUs (a quickly shrinking market) are coming to an end compounded by the fact that they have nothing to compete with APUs and Tegra has just likely received it's final deathblow in the form of Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800. Ouya and Shield are products with a limited lifespan because they are nothing more than dumping grounds for all that Tegra silicon no one wanted to buy from them.As AMD and Intel continue to pursue platform solutions and integrated CPUs, we may not be able to successfully compete and our business could be negatively impacted. Despite the use of these integrated CPUs, personal computer, or PC, builders and consumers have continued to embrace discrete GPUs to provide higher performance, or the GPU attach rate. If integrated CPUs offer a more compelling value proposition in the future, our GPU attach rate could decrease, which could adversely affect our business and cause our financial results to decline.
People are also under the misapprehension that it's a terrifically profitable place for AMD to be. That isn't really the case.
Can you provide any links to back up your statements? Anything that shows your statement to be true?