Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why don't more people use these insane cards for gaming, and what boards support these insane cards?
That's not quite true... the Quadro FX5600 iirc has identical clocks to the 8800GTX, but has 1.5GBs RAM, making it potentially better performing... of course at its price, it's definitely not worth getting unless you do some serious CAD work.
That's not quite true... the Quadro FX5600 iirc has identical clocks to the 8800GTX, but has 1.5GBs RAM, making it potentially better performing... of course at its price, it's definitely not worth getting unless you do some serious CAD work.
With this mod, what won't work compared to a Quadro?You can still soft mod the 8800 series to a quadro. I modded my 8800 GTS 640 MB to a Quadro 4600. Now I can use the real-view feature in Solidworks. Crysis demo still runs really well with settings at High. Might not be a real quadro but it works.
You can still soft mod the 8800 series to a quadro. I modded my 8800 GTS 640 MB to a Quadro 4600. Now I can use the real-view feature in Solidworks. Crysis demo still runs really well with settings at High. Might not be a real quadro but it works.
You can still soft mod the 8800 series to a quadro. I modded my 8800 GTS 640 MB to a Quadro 4600. Now I can use the real-view feature in Solidworks. Crysis demo still runs really well with settings at High. Might not be a real quadro but it works.
It simply doesn't. Due to some specific features and optimisations, it's slower in games and faster in CAD stuff when displaying complex models. It's always been that way with the Quadro cards, every generation.That's not quite true... the Quadro FX5600 iirc has identical clocks to the 8800GTX, but has 1.5GBs RAM, making it potentially better performing
I wonder how much of that is by design, meaning, intentional on NVidia's part to segregate their two video lines for purely marketing purposes. It wouldn't make any financial sense for NVidia to have their gaming cards excel in Maya or their Quadro cards be capable of playing Crysis @2560x1600, right?It simply doesn't. Due to some specific features and optimisations, it's slower in games and faster in CAD stuff when displaying complex models. It's always been that way with the Quadro cards, every generation.
I recently purchased an nVidia 8800GTS 512 card. Works great for the couple of games I run and alright while running Solidworks 2007 for my own business. I've been trying out Solidworks 2008 before I move all my models to it, and so far the graphics hick-ups are pretty bad, about 1/2 the performance of 2007. At another job I run SW 2007 on a XP64 machine w/8GB ram. We tried out a Quadro FX 4600 and I get a BSOD when working in SW even with the latest drivers. Some other 32bit machines have their own minor issues while showing little improvement when going from ATI 128MB cards. To my point, I would like to try modding my 8800 to improve SW performance. My experience working with the newer Quadro FX cards showed very little improvement for the cash, add to it a major instability with Solidworks on the XP64 platform, no chance I'm gonna make that purchase. KimoCal, can you provide any details to your success modding your 8800?
I wonder how much of that is by design, meaning, intentional on NVidia's part to segregate their two video lines for purely marketing purposes. It wouldn't make any financial sense for NVidia to have their gaming cards excel in Maya or their Quadro cards be capable of playing Crysis @2560x1600, right?
You can still soft mod the 8800 series to a quadro. I modded my 8800 GTS 640 MB to a Quadro 4600. Now I can use the real-view feature in Solidworks. Crysis demo still runs really well with settings at High. Might not be a real quadro but it works.
If I can save some money going with a GeForce card that would be nice, but I've read that you don't really get the performance of the Quadros, even with soft-modding.
Have you run any benchmarks to compare how your card does against a real 4600? I'm thinking that going with the real thing might be the best move for me.
Also, I'm wondering if the release of the new GeForce cards means there might be new Quadros coming soon and the current Quadros may drop in price soon. Anyone know?
Backup for that claim?
I don't have access or want to pay for a real Quadro so I can't do an A/B comparison. But the difference between the standard GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB and when it is soft-modded is night and day. When using it as a GeForce in SW08 I get artifacts all the time. Since using it as soft-modded Quadro I have yet to have any issues and have the Real View working.
What benchmarking software can be utilized to show the difference between the two states? Based upon my real world usage, I'd say try the soft-modded one first and save yourself a butt load of $$$ ($1200+ minimum vs $170 at the Egg + 15 minutes of your time). If it doesn't work for you then return it and get real Quadro.
I believe the new 8800 GT 512 MB would be equivalent to the Quadro FX 3600 they recently released as they both have 512 MB on them. Not sure on the 9X00 series cards.
Check out this link where someone else did the same.
For reference my card is the EVGA Super Clocked 8800 GTS 640 MB (640-P2-N825-AR).
Thanks for the help.