NSA's Coded Tweet Deciphered Using Online Tool

H

HardOCP News

[H] News
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
0
It looks like the NSA's coded tweet has already been solved using an online cryptogram tool.

tpfccdlfdtte pcaccplircdt dklpcfrp?qeiq lhpqlipqeodf gpwafopwprti izxndkiqpkii krirrifcapnc dxkdciqcafmd vkfpcadf turned out to be: want to know what it takes to work at nsa? check back each monday as we explore careers essential to protecting your nation.
Click to expand...
 
do i get to wear my jack boots and stomp on some hippies? :D
 
The jackboots always talk about "protecting" something, but in the end all they protect are the guys at the top of the foodchain, and that ain't us.
 
Protecting our nation? Like from losing good jobs that are only replaced with worse jobs due to corporations only worrying about profit? Or from a rigged financial market in general? Or from inflation of a fiat currency that is controlled by a few groups of bankers?

Oh, you mean protect our nation from the other bad guys. Like the people around the world we either stole from or dropped bombs on coming after us for it. Got it.

"Protect your nation from the blowback your government causes"
 
JaiWebb said:
Protecting our nation? Like from losing good jobs that are only replaced with worse jobs due to corporations only worrying about profit? Or from a rigged financial market in general? Or from inflation of a fiat currency that is controlled by a few groups of bankers?

Oh, you mean protect our nation from the other bad guys. Like the people around the world we either stole from or dropped bombs on coming after us for it. Got it.

"Protect your nation from the blowback your government causes"
Click to expand...

sigh.

another uninformed democrat.

clearly you dont know squat about evil "corporations". They have a duty to provide profits for the shareholders. Thats all a corporation's duty is. It is NOT to take care of the "worker"(communist term) or provide benefits. It is ONLY to make profit for the shareholders. Then again, i wouldn't expect anyone spouting your rhetoric to understand that.
 
oh, and before you go saying i agree with the NSA, i am not their number 1 fan. I also disagree with the wars in iraq and afghanistan... i much rather think we should have just bombed them back to the stone age and left ;)
 
viper650 said:
oh, and before you go saying i agree with the NSA, i am not their number 1 fan. I also disagree with the wars in iraq and afghanistan... i much rather think we should have just bombed them back to the stone age and left ;)
Click to expand...

I don't see how the NSA is responsible for declaring war. That's a congressional thingey.
 
viper650 said:
sigh.

another uninformed democrat.

clearly you dont know squat about evil "corporations". They have a duty to provide profits for the shareholders. Thats all a corporation's duty is. It is NOT to take care of the "worker"(communist term) or provide benefits. It is ONLY to make profit for the shareholders. Then again, i wouldn't expect anyone spouting your rhetoric to understand that.
Click to expand...

Nothing you said is even relevant compared to what I said. Nothing. I mentioned it being 'a problem' that corporations ONLY ever care about profits, so, you respond with telling me corporations only ever have to worry about profits. Way to miss the entire fucking point, seriously. :rolleyes::D:rolleyes::D

Then again, I wouldn't expect anyone that's too lazy to use proper capitalization to understand it.


another uninformed democrat.
Click to expand...

Derp.
 
viper650 said:
oh, and before you go saying i agree with the NSA, i am not their number 1 fan. I also disagree with the wars in iraq and afghanistan... i much rather think we should have just bombed them back to the stone age and left ;)
Click to expand...

I hope someone drops a bomb on your bloodline.
 
I deciphered it and it said "Enjoying your cup of coffee as you lie in bed playing with your tablet?"

:eek:
 
viper650 said:
sigh.

another uninformed democrat.

clearly you dont know squat about evil "corporations". They have a duty to provide profits for the shareholders. Thats all a corporation's duty is. It is NOT to take care of the "worker"(communist term) or provide benefits. It is ONLY to make profit for the shareholders. Then again, i wouldn't expect anyone spouting your rhetoric to understand that.
Click to expand...

Fundamentally yes, but only an ignorant sociopath would think that providing employees with a positive work environment and a means to keep their family out of poverty would not have a positive effect on production, and thus, stock performance.
 
Gweenz said:
Fundamentally yes, but only an ignorant sociopath would think that providing employees with a positive work environment and a means to keep their family out of poverty would not have a positive effect on production, and thus, stock performance.
Click to expand...

Also to add... not to mention not all companies are public thus don't have any stockholders appease.
 
viper650 said:
clearly you dont know squat about evil "corporations". They have a duty to provide profits for the shareholders. Thats all a corporation's duty is. It is NOT to take care of the "worker"(communist term) or provide benefits. It is ONLY to make profit for the shareholders. Then again, i wouldn't expect anyone spouting your rhetoric to understand that.
Click to expand...

I think you would agree that a corporation's endless pursuit of maximum profit is not necessarily in the best interest of citizens or the nation, or even the long term prospects for the company. One of the roles of government is to create laws to enforce ethical behavior on souless corporate entities.

Not sure what this has to do with the subject at hand...
 
"want to know what it takes to work at nsa? check back each monday as we explore careers essential to protecting your nation."

nothing like a PR spin to deflect the negative talk surrounding their unconstitutional activities.
 
I'd work for the NSA in a heartbeat. Government job, decent benefits, cool technology, etc. It makes no sense to me why people hate on the NSA. They are just doing what every other county is doing. Unfortunately, they were exposed and continue to be dragged through the mud by hipsters who have no idea what it takes to keep the country safe, nor do they admit that their constant need for attention has just made it easier to spy on. Y'all can't have it both ways, and spying on everyone is here to stay, no matter what they tell you on the nightly news, spying is going to continue to be around and increase.
 
^ I would never work for the NSA because their illegal information gets passed on and kills innocent people indiscriminately. They also violate the private property of every citizen and guest that uses anything other than paper for communication. They systematically create weak points in tech infrastructure that is a national security threat, in addition to a violation of property rights. The NSA is a threat to national security. The fact that every other country does it doesn't change the fact that the deaths of innocent people would be on your hands. They are a complete evil. A backwater of society.
 
aardvark sandwich said:
They systematically create weak points in tech infrastructure that is a national security threat, in addition to a violation of property rights
Click to expand...

Yup, and in a world where the Internet is used to move vast amounts of data and control important systems, ignoring cyber terrain as a place where warfare isn't conducted is like building a walled fortress, but just skipping one of four walls because it might offend someone's personal tastes since it would let the city watch see in their window at night when they're having an affair.

Thinking like that is super-duper selfish and we should monitor and incarcerate people who think that way and promote their dangerous views to society to further their own selfish ends. I'm all for that since it'll mean more prison jobs and fewer criminals using the Internet as a tool for their nefarious aims.
 
The Federal government and NSA basically wipe their asses with the US Constitution, along with several state governments.
 
CreepyUncleGoogle said:
Yup, and in a world where the Internet is used to move vast amounts of data and control important systems, ignoring cyber terrain as a place where warfare isn't conducted is like building a walled fortress, but just skipping one of four walls because it might offend someone's personal tastes since it would let the city watch see in their window at night when they're having an affair.

Thinking like that is super-duper selfish and we should monitor and incarcerate people who think that way and promote their dangerous views to society to further their own selfish ends. I'm all for that since it'll mean more prison jobs and fewer criminals using the Internet as a tool for their nefarious aims.
Click to expand...

Congrats, this is the stupidest thing I have ever read here. That's saying something.
 
aardvark sandwich said:
Congrats, this is the stupidest thing I have ever read here. That's saying something.
Click to expand...

I'm not at all surprised you decided to ignore the cyber warfare part as it's pretty much impossible to come up with an anarchy-approved way of rationally addressing enemy nation states acting against the interests of insignificant, ungoverned tribal organizations that form when there's a lack of a broadly supported, equally powerful institution. *headpats* It's okay to have views that don't make sense as long as you and I both know they're thoughtlessly silly objections to how things actually work in the world.
 
For starters, according to you I should be imprisoned right now. Because of something I think. But not the people who have killed innocent people. They protect innocent people from bad things (except like being killed, which they directly cause). You aren't making anyone any safer, you're just an authoritarian tyrant.

What in the blue fuck is anarchy-approved? What the actual fuck?

You want to rationally address enemy nation states, but want anyone acting out of rational self-interest imprisoned. If no one can act out of rational self interest, you get an economic calculation problem. You don't even know how expensive toilet paper should be. (Say high to Venezuela!) How can you even decide who an enemy nation state is if everyone is imprisoned for acting out of rational self interest? And who will run these prisons? Is this one of those newfangled 'government is us' mindfucks where the inmates volunteer to imprison themselves? And why would an anarchist even give a flying fuck about an "enemy nation state". That's your imagined problem. I don't care about your silly geographical constructs, technology exists beyond the scope of your stupid territorial boundary.
 
aardvark sandwich said:
For starters, according to you I should be imprisoned right now. Because of something I think. But not the people who have killed innocent people. They protect innocent people from bad things (except like being killed, which they directly cause). You aren't making anyone any safer, you're just an authoritarian tyrant.

What in the blue fuck is anarchy-approved? What the actual fuck?

You want to rationally address enemy nation states, but want anyone acting out of rational self-interest imprisoned. If no one can act out of rational self interest, you get an economic calculation problem. You don't even know how expensive toilet paper should be. (Say high to Venezuela!) How can you even decide who an enemy nation state is if everyone is imprisoned for acting out of rational self interest? And who will run these prisons? Is this one of those newfangled 'government is us' mindfucks where the inmates volunteer to imprison themselves? And why would an anarchist even give a flying fuck about an "enemy nation state". That's your imagined problem. I don't care about your silly geographical constructs, technology exists beyond the scope of your stupid territorial boundary.
Click to expand...

You missed the part about the fortress and the walls and cyber terrain again.
 
CreepyUncleGoogle said:
You missed the part about the fortress and the walls and cyber terrain again.
Click to expand...

its not skipping a wall, they purposely employ backdoors into said wall.

i'm trying to explain to you, I couldn't care less if our government is attacked by another government.
it doesn't concern me.

stop worrying about who is king shit of fuck mountain.
 
aardvark sandwich said:
its not skipping a wall, they purposely employ backdoors into said wall.

i'm trying to explain to you, I couldn't care less if our government is attacked by another government.
it doesn't concern me.

stop worrying about who is king shit of fuck mountain.
Click to expand...

If you're not worried about what institution is in charge or what might replace it if it goes away, then why are you worried about the institution that's in charge?
 
You seem to let it become a major concern as it occupies a lot of your post history. That kinda makes a person think it's pretty significant. ;)
 
Concern is the wrong word.

I aim to turn more people off of the government. I've never denied it and it should be pretty obvious.
 
I told my boss point blank I'm an anarcho-capitalist.

I talked to him for about two hours about politics one day. It was fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top