Watch "Peeping Webcam? With NSA Help, British Spy Agency Intercepted Millions of Yahoo Chat Images" on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bewu5UQ2sMU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bewu5UQ2sMU
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watch "Peeping Webcam? With NSA Help, British Spy Agency Intercepted Millions of Yahoo Chat Images" on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bewu5UQ2sMU
ou're now really trying to get benefit of the doubt that out of two million invaded accounts, that not a single one of them is included erroneously, either intentionally or by mistake?
It's pretty easy to do, you start by only sampling foreign traffic, you know, Foreign intelligence Service. IP's from other countries.
Tell me guys, why is it that all the articles now seem to be about Britain not the NSA?
Why do that articles have no information that actual shows US Persons are being targeted, instead it's just a few slides that show some previously unmentioned tactic with incomplete records as proof and the door left open for the gullible to make their assumptions?
At what point will you at least consider questioning the story being laid out before you?
There is nothing about this story that shows the NSA has violated any US Citizen's rights.
What we REALLLLLY need is a website which simply lays out all the facts. Have you heard of something like this?
I noticed that with the youtube link above.
The anchor says stuff about xbox while they're showing a document which doesn't say anything about the xbox at at all.
What we REALLLLLY need is a website which simply lays out all the facts. Have you heard of something like this?
And people wonder why I don't want a Kinect in my family room.....
Chockomonkey, I wish I had a news source I trusted but I don't think that's how the news game is played anymore.
Back when I first heard, that concept that 'Oh no, this will be used by the governments to invade our home and track us... I thought..haha, yeah right'. Then a story like this comes out and I can't help but think ... uhh. What a strange world when the conspiracy theory nutcases have a better touch on reality than yourself.
But see that's exactly my point. There isn't one.
Why hasn't one started up?
My guess is that people actually don't want one. They want to be told how to think, and actually doing research on topics and getting the facts is just too much work.
So the outcome of such a site could be two-fold:
1. No one gives a shit, and the site tanks.
2. The site actually condenses the facts in such a way that make it easy to digest, and the power shift away from the current media outlets begins.
It's just odd to me that NO ONE has started up a fact-based news site without bias. Or maybe they have and they don't catch any steam.
ut see that's exactly my point. There isn't one.
The only way to unbias all the news would be to have all the humanity taken out of news coverage, which won't be done until the machines take over.
It's pretty easy to do, you start by only sampling foreign traffic, you know, Foreign intelligence Service. IP's from other countries.
Tell me guys, why is it that all the articles now seem to be about Britain not the NSA?
Why do that articles have no information that actual shows US Persons are being targeted, instead it's just a few slides that show some previously unmentioned tactic with incomplete records as proof and the door left open for the gullible to make their assumptions?
At what point will you at least consider questioning the story being laid out before you?
There is nothing about this story that shows the NSA has violated any US Citizen's rights.
Documents leaked by Snowden in 2013 revealed that the FVEY have been intentionally spying on one another's citizens and sharing the collected information with each other in order to circumvent restrictive domestic regulations on spying.
I don't think a completely un-biased news website or company is possible because as human beings we are all inherently biased. Even with the best of intentions, stories are always written on some bias. It's inevitable and human, so as consumers of news we have to use our own biases to see the story's bias... it's all just a futile exercise really.
Riight, no you are right, but it's because that isn't what sells. See my example above. Fear sells some things but no one ever sold a bomb shelter with feel good broadcasting.
Another example, Jan Brewer, she just vetoed that bill that people said would allow businesses to discriminate against gays. Now the bill didn't actually say that, it's just that the bill supported religious protection and we all know religion is the great enemy of but pirates the world over, therefor, this bill must be anti-gay.
Regardless, Jan Brewer vetoed it and as far as the news is concerned, it's already forgotten because there is no reason left to fear it. It can't sell anything anymore so it's forgotten. But we know that the AZ Senate could, however unlikely, over ride Her veto.