• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Now THIS would be a multi-tasking king

i think seeing the 1-2-2-3 ram last night was more impressive :p

everyone knew a PD chip can get up there like that ;)
tho his setup is like.........farking crazy, thats hard core


soulsaver_8229
 
soulsaver_8229 said:
i think seeing the 1-2-2-3 ram last night was more impressive :p

everyone knew a PD chip can get up there like that ;)
tho his setup is like.........farking crazy, thats hard core


soulsaver_8229
Click to expand...

The thing is, cas doesn't really matter a whole lot. Trrd and Trp have a much larger play in ram bandwidth and latency. Having values of 0's for these would be great on an A64 meethinks.
 
USMC2Hard4U said:
I would deffinatly go back to Intel if I could do something like this :)
Click to expand...

The thing that interests me the most about that is the ram. I've never seen 0's for both Trp and Trrd. I THINK I've seeon a 0 for Trrd. But wow, 0's for both?
 
That ram timing sure is wierd looking.. Very nice oc though... However, 28 seconds for 1mb pi? Kinda high don't you think? :confused:
 
mpcamer1220 said:
That ram timing sure is wierd looking.. Very nice oc though... However, 28 seconds for 1mb pi? Kinda high don't you think? :confused:
Click to expand...

I don't really care for SuperPI that much. Pentium 4's should be getting incredibly short times on them but they don't since the FPU's arent fully utilized.
 
The only reason I still might Go Intel this round (even tho their dual core CPUs are not all that compared to the competetion)

Is because of the strong SIMD capabilities of the FPU. WinXP64 and Longhorn dont use x87 anymore, and only use SIMD instructions.

Grrr why cant we have the best of both worlds!!!!
 
So neither Intel or AMD are offering dual CPU systems for their dual core processors yet?
 
Moosh said:
So neither Intel or AMD are offering dual CPU systems for their dual core processors yet?
Click to expand...
AMD has been for a long time. The opteron x65-x75. Intel feels its more fulfilling to not compete with AMD's products at this time. I'd imagine a quad 875 system would definately beat this OC'd Pentium D, but, for price... the Intel wins by a few thousand dollars.
 
Thanks I will go to the AMD section to ask about it. Before I go, does anyone one else have any suggestions for my graphics box? Are there any better solutions for rendering speed using programs like Maya, 3D studio max, Adobe products, etc.
 
robberbaron said:
Intel feels its more fulfilling to not compete with AMD's products at this time.
Click to expand...

Nah, they would just rather seclude AMD from the market entirely for the time being with illegal business practices.
 
Heh, it's good to see that the sharky forum guys are getting something done.

<3 Sharky's :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top