Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
drdeutsch said:
PTNL said:on-topic answer: use norton 2006, skip the system works package (and internet security package as well).
off-topic: nowadays i prefer avg over norton due to the excessive bloating and longer intervals between virus definition updates. this trend has been getting worse over the past 3 years, and is even seen with the norton corporate software (versions 10 and up)
NFav said:Which would you guys prefer...
AVG or NOD 32
NFav said:Which would you guys prefer...
AVG or NOD 32

KoolDrew said:Both avast! and AntiVir are much better then AVG (all are free). If you don't mind paying for one either get NOD32 or Kaspersky. However, I would just use avast! It is a great anti-virus and it is free.
Listen, and learn. Otherwise, continue to deal with issues, whether they be a virus, or the Symantec program itself.Ice Czar said:NOD32 hands down
but then no single ap is a bulletproof solution
it has to be an indepth defense and NOD32 is simply one of the gatekeepers
Id also highly recommend ProcessGuard
more or less a firewall for the kernel itself
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=768776
#2) Enumerating Badness
Back in the early days of computer security, there were only a relatively small number of well-known security holes. That had a lot to do with the widespread adoption of "Default Permit" because, when there were only 15 well-known ways to hack into a network, it was possible to individually examine and think about those 15 attack vectors and block them. So security practitioners got into the habit of "Enumerating Badness" - listing all the bad things that we know about. Once you list all the badness, then you can put things in place to detect it, or block it.
The "Badness Gap"
![]()
Why is "Enumerating Badness" a dumb idea? It's a dumb idea because sometime around 1992 the amount of Badness in the Internet began to vastly outweigh the amount of Goodness. For every harmless, legitimate, application, there are dozens or hundreds of pieces of malware, worm tests, exploits, or viral code. Examine a typical antivirus package and you'll see it knows about 75,000+ viruses that might infect your machine. Compare that to the legitimate 30 or so apps that I've installed on my machine, and you can see it's rather dumb to try to track 75,000 pieces of Badness when even a simpleton could track 30 pieces of Goodness. In fact, if I were to simply track the 30 pieces of Goodness on my machine, and allow nothing else to run, I would have simultaneously solved the following problems:
* Spyware
* Viruses
* Remote Control Trojans
* Exploits that involve executing pre-installed code that you don't use regularly
Thanks to all the marketing hype around disclosing and announcing vulnerabilities, there are (according to some industry analysts) between 200 and 700 new pieces of Badness hitting the Internet every month. Not only is "Enumerating Badness" a dumb idea, it's gotten dumber during the few minutes of your time you've bequeathed me by reading this article.
Now, your typical IT executive, when I discuss this concept with him or her, will stand up and say something like, "That sounds great, but our enterprise network is really complicated. Knowing about all the different apps that we rely on would be impossible! What you're saying sounds reasonable until you think about it and realize how absurd it is!" To which I respond, "How can you call yourself a 'Chief Technology Officer' if you have no idea what your technology is doing?" A CTO isn't going to know detail about every application on the network, but if you haven't got a vague idea what's going on it's impossible to do capacity planning, disaster planning, security planning, or virtually any of the things in a CTO's charter.
In 1994 I wrote a firewall product that needed some system log analysis routines that would alert the administrator in case some kind of unexpected condition was detected. The first version used "Enumerating Badness" (I've been dumb, too) but the second version used what I termed "Artificial Ignorance" - a process whereby you throw away the log entries you know aren't interesting. If there's anything left after you've thrown away the stuff you know isn't interesting, then the leftovers must be interesting. This approach worked amazingly well, and detected a number of very interesting operational conditions and errors that it simply never would have occurred to me to look for.
"Enumerating Badness" is the idea behind a huge number of security products and systems, from anti-virus to intrusion detection, intrusion prevention, application security, and "deep packet inspection" firewalls. What these programs and devices do is outsource your process of knowing what's good. Instead of you taking the time to list the 30 or so legitimate things you need to do, it's easier to pay $29.95/year to someone else who will try to maintain an exhaustive list of all the evil in the world. Except, unfortunately, your badness expert will get $29.95/year for the antivirus list, another $29.95/year for the spyware list, and you'll buy a $19.95 "personal firewall" that has application control for network applications. By the time you're done paying other people to enumerate all the malware your system could come in contact with, you'll more than double the cost of your "inexpensive" desktop operating system.
One clear symptom that you have a case of "Enumerating Badness" is that you've got a system or software that needs signature updates on a regular basis, or a system that lets past a new worm that it hasn't seen before. The cure for "Enumerating Badness" is, of course, "Enumerating Goodness." Amazingly, there is virtually no support in operating systems for such software-level controls. I've tried using Windows XP Pro's Program Execution Control but it's oriented toward "Enumerating Badness" and is, itself a dumb implementation of a dumb idea.
In a sense, "Enumerating Badness" is a special dumb-case of "Default Permit" - our #1 dumb computer security idea. But it's so prevalent that it's in a class by itself.
Sorry I can't help with that problem because I don't use Norton, butNFav said:I install norton antivirus 2005, 2006 and norton systemworks fine but when I go to activate it, the screen does not respond and I can't click 'next' to continue to activate by phone.
Any suggestions...
ozziegn said:i dont use any antivirus software and i have yet to have any problems.
Impossible! They will linger on your PC FOREVER.First uninstall all Symantec Products.
some viruses you can't even notice... trojans for example...ozziegn said:i dont use any antivirus software and i have yet to have any problems.
mosin said:There are four things in my System Tray. All were selected for security reasons, and they all work.
1) PocoMail
2) NOD32
3) Kerio 2.1.5
4) ProcessGuard
![]()
Take a strong look at #1 when you get time. It's a keeper, too.Sieravor said:Excellent list, mine is the same, minus #1.
I think you can disable the setting to check web pages.. strange that it would freeze up like that.gemini8026 said:What bothers me is that I dislike Norton but use it, and have had issues with NOD32. I run a clean system but it seems like NOD freezes/spikes my computer randomly when viewing random pictures on Explorer.
The processor spikes to 100, and when i close it it drops. Only happens with NOD32![]()