alright, i have a 2.0 ghz P4 north wood, and a 1.8 ghz Willamette.
the willamette seems to run things alot slower. i know that it is 200mhz slower than the northwood, but what else makes this chip slower. in other words, what are some of the main differences between the two chips. both are 400mhz fsb btw.
here are screen shots of both chips, the things that i noticed to be different are the voltages, clock speed and l2 cache. does l2 cache effect performance alot?
to tell you the truth i have never heard of a willamette until i got one in a shuttle system i bought on these forums.
i know that the northwood is OCed in the first screen shot, but even at stock speeds it seems ALOT faster than this willamette
here are the screen shots....
the willamette seems to run things alot slower. i know that it is 200mhz slower than the northwood, but what else makes this chip slower. in other words, what are some of the main differences between the two chips. both are 400mhz fsb btw.
here are screen shots of both chips, the things that i noticed to be different are the voltages, clock speed and l2 cache. does l2 cache effect performance alot?
to tell you the truth i have never heard of a willamette until i got one in a shuttle system i bought on these forums.
i know that the northwood is OCed in the first screen shot, but even at stock speeds it seems ALOT faster than this willamette
here are the screen shots....