• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

no PS vs PS3.0

Holy barn apples and peaches...that's fuggin HUGE!!!!....bahaha

ATI better realise their PS3.0 soon.
 
So you're comparing no PS, to PS 3.0? How about PS 2.0 vs. PS 3.0.

How about not leeching bandwidth too.
 
Originally posted by fallguy
So you're comparing no PS, to PS 3.0? How about PS 2.0 vs. PS 3.0.

How about not leeching bandwidth too.
Click to expand...
I made that correction already.
 
Or no PS to 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.0 3.0 That would be a true test.

I'm thinking PS3.0 will be just a little less noticable than DX8.1 was compared to DX8.0

This is afterall a Huge jump from 9.0b to 9.0c ;)

Yeah, I'm downplaying 3.0 a bit... But really its not the DX10 holy grail Nvidia will want to make it out to be. It wasn't the holy grail when ATi hyped 1.4 and 2.0 a long time ago either.
 
All I know is that its pretty sad that a couple of you jumped all over this thinking it was a PS2.0 to PS3.0 comparison..

Just points out that your obviously clueless because even a casual gamer whoes played ANY PS game would have seen instantly that the first shots had no PS

sad how far fanboys will go.
 
Originally posted by TheGameguru
All I know is that its pretty sad that a couple of you jumped all over this thinking it was a PS2.0 to PS3.0 comparison..

Just points out that your obviously clueless because even a casual gamer whoes played ANY PS game would have seen instantly that the first shots had no PS

sad how far fanboys will go.
Click to expand...

Jesus, give the man a break, he corrected it already. If you want a fucking cookie go rape Betty Crocker.
 
find some shader 2.0. i would love to see the diffrence.
3.0 is not all talk

:cool:
 
3.0 makes a noticeable difference in motion. Some of the effects are impossible to demonstrate in a screen shot.

There's a video of the Farcry 3.0 demo out there. Go look for it (the link that I got it from is dead already).
 
Originally posted by onetwo
There's a video of the Farcry 3.0 demo out there. Go look for it (the link that I got it from is dead already).
Click to expand...

The ATI fanboys must have gotten to it already. :eek:
 
Originally posted by onetwo
3.0 makes a noticeable difference in motion. Some of the effects are impossible to demonstrate in a screen shot.
Click to expand...

That's a nice cover statement to make incase this whole thing doesnt go your way
 
well we have 3.0 screenshots. how bout we get some 2.0 screenys in to compare?
 
Originally posted by Bad_Boy
well we have 3.0 screenshots. how bout we get some 2.0 screenys in to compare?
Click to expand...

why? so you can say, OMG LOook aT the DUST ON THAT ROCK!!! It ROxoRS mY boxoRS!!

Then OBS will say, "night and day difference, nvidiots now own the world"

Then onetwo will chime in with "it only works good in motion" I'll bump the thread in a couple months when someone finally proves it.

COME IN FACE!!!
 
Is it no PS at all, or like PS 1.1? If it's no PS it just looks like a way to exaggerate the difference? This influx of mad posting from the three stooges is really getting annoying...
 
How about a review betwen a Nvidia TNT2 and the new 6800U , i think that we need somethin like this to complete this post .
 
Originally posted by SnakEyez187
Is it no PS at all, or like PS 1.1? If it's no PS it just looks like a way to exaggerate the difference? This influx of mad posting from the three stooges is really getting annoying...
Click to expand...

Don't let them annoy you, that's what they want to do, instead laugh at their dumbasses, they are funny as shit. They could be young little wannabe nvidia marketers, who are we to stop them.
Heheheh... I think they actually think people are going to buy videocards based on the information that they give. Comedy gold. Helps get through the work day though.

What's even funnier was that he didn't even realize that ps was not being applied in the first post. Musta been some thick green glaze. Bwhahahaha.
 
He sure is having a hard time finding a big difference. Far Cry has ps3.0 right? This can't be this hard. Where's the info?
 
Just noticed it was Sean (Pelly) that wrote the article. He thought it was ps2.0to ps3.0 as well. Nvidiots getting owned everywhere. Word to the wise, let the 6800u talk for itself, it does better that way, you guys are ruining the party.
 
For the last year people were saying that PS 2.0 is must, nvidia sux and so on, now they are trying to margize PS 3.0 oh well I guess that ati fanboyz have a few hard days atm :D
 
Originally posted by Michaelius
For the last year people were saying that PS 2.0 is must, nvidia sux and so on, now they are trying to margize PS 3.0 oh well I guess that ati fanboyz have a few hard days atm :D
Click to expand...

the difference between 1.1 and 2.0 was very noticable. 2.0 to 3.0 is yet to be determined. BUt from what I have read it took the makers at far cry 2 weeks to implement 3.0 from 2.0, yet there are a lot of games that do not have ps2.0 in them yet. That should be a hint for you right there.
 
it was 3 weeks based off that far cry vid, and maybe its so short because its possibly easier to implement?

ill wait for the shader 2.0 vs shader 3.0
after that watching that video again, it seems you would notice the shadows and the diffrence much greater in motion. and im not trying "save" myself from anything, frankly i dont care if you think i am. lol

but watch the craptastic quality video again and see for yourself. when moving on the rocks/beach, when the trees had moving shadows on the rocks, you notice alot better results than just a screenshot.

edit: also many games are just now coming out with shader 2.0 because when shader 2.0 first came out nvidia had really no support for it, and ati cards were the only ones with it. now when the fx hardware came out you notice more games with shader 2.0 coming out (during 2003-2004). shader 3.0 is probally going to adapt much quicker due to so many games coming out THIS YEAR. both nvidia and ati are going to support it (ati in Q3)

ill still buy the best card in june.
 
it was 3 weeks based off that far cry vid, and maybe its so short because its possibly easier to implement?
Click to expand...

Of course we don't know if he just rewrote his 2.0 shaders to 3.0, or added more shaders to it. Transforming 2.0 code to 3.0 is going to take a lot less time than writing new code
 
Damn, sorry for the mistake. I would change the title if I could. Still nice to see the screenshots. Besides, this isn't the first time this week someone has posted pics which required the reading of headings and info before coming to the correct conclusion.
 
Nice pictures but really of no value, why?

1) compairing no shaders to 3.0 is just plain well you can guess it.

2) To see the value with current systems one would have to run both shaders (2.0 and 3.0) and see the visual difference. I don't doubt that it 3.0 should be nicer, but I like my pictures.

3) You would have to bench using both to see what kind of performance VS IQ hit you would get if any, for all we know maybe 3.0 is more efficient maybe not.

4) Time line, is this going to be a usable feature in the next 12 months? Maybe yes maybe no, if yes it maybe worth having it as a selling feature, if not it will be just like ATI’s 2.0 if not implemented in games it becomes, useless.

I heard one good thing about 3.0, it would seem easier to develop on, or something along that line.
Just need more info, till we can make up our minds. Oh BTW, do we know for sure that ATI r420 won't do 3.0 shaders? We maybe surprised that it do's. It's not like ATI is sitting in the dark with no knowledge of the future, both companies know more about were things are heading than all of us put together.
 
Originally posted by obs
Damn, sorry for the mistake. I would change the title if I could. Still nice to see the screenshots. Besides, this isn't the first time this week someone has posted pics which required the reading of headings and info before coming to the correct conclusion.
Click to expand...

Don't worry about it, those pics got a lot of people that wanted it to be so.;)

But you have played far cry on a directx 9 card right? I've played half of the game and I can't tell any difference between the ps3.0 shots and what I remember in game. Just quit trying to sell the card, everyone likes the card, you're making yourself look foolish with this agenda/vendetta/disorder that you have working here.
 
I think that the pics were actually being taunted by nvidia at first to make people believe that was the difference between ps2 and 3, a lot of people fell for it. Most know it's a gf2 mx rendering the other shots. lolz
 
Originally posted by creedAMD
Don't worry about it, those pics got a lot of people that wanted it to be so.;)

But you have played far cry on a directx 9 card right? I've played half of the game and I can't tell any difference between the ps3.0 shots and what I remember in game. Just quit trying to sell the card, everyone likes the card, you're making yourself look foolish with this agenda/vendetta/disorder that you have working here.
Click to expand...
I just wanted to see the difference between PS2.0/3.0. Still do actually.
 
Originally posted by obs
I just wanted to see the difference between PS2.0/3.0. Still do actually.
Click to expand...

no, you wanted to show everyone else the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top