bigbadgreen said:And now we wonder why parts cost so much. when people return working parts it ups the cost for everybody, even with restocking fees they still eat the cost. They are standing behind their products. they will exchange the mobo for the exact same one. that says if it's defective, no problem you get a new one. by thinking that they are responsible for hardware conflicts (very rare) or boards that people just don't like (won't overclock well, doesn't seem fast enough), is like saying GM is responsible if you modify one of their cars engines and it doesn't get the power you think it should, and should give you another car.
If the mobo is buggy rma it for the same board, if it's still buggy it's not their problem. It's not their problem if they sell a fully working board. NE is doing everything they should, it's not their business to have you test mobos, but half of the people ehre seem to think so. Why don't some of you build computers and just keep rmaing parts every 29 days to get cutting edge, because that's exactly what you're describing. trading in a working part to get a different part because it didn't work how you thought it should.
Computer parts aren't in the same game as the food industry, when you buy a $120 steak and try to return it for a different entree because you didn't read the menu right i bet they just don't wisk it away and bring you anything.
This is exactly the childish whining that allows for ridiculously poor customer service.
Your opinion will change when you experience a similar situation.
If you buy a 120 steak and it sucks they will MOST CERTAINLY replace your dinner with a different item. As long as they aren't giving you back the 120 bucks you will get near zero argument or fuss EVER.
There is a cost to do BUSINESS. There is a reason not every schmoe can be a reseller.
Stop selling ABIT boards if they are continually being RMA'd.
OR list the item as an item for EXPERTS only. Advertise it as needing tweaks to run. Take the friggin 5 seconds to add info to the individual pages beyond the companies PR blurbs.
How much "research" should be done to be a customer?
All major companies will have a RTV service. I am certian NE does as well. They are going to eat all of 10 or 12 bucks on each mobo order that gets returned. They made more than that off of the original purchase and will keep that if you return the board for a different in stock item of equal or near equal value.
THEY HAVE A 15% RESTOCKING FEE!
Thats 18 or so bucks they earn out of 120 and get the card back.
A business should be the expert not the customer. After all its their BUSINESS for chrissakes.
I fully understand the user error concept but mobo's that need you to make major BIOS adjustments and avoid extremely popular components like Antec psu's should have those issues noted by the company selling(or reselling) them. I am talking about mobo's that never work for users. Not a guy who had one quit after 2 years.
And the raised prices whine goes to show now naive folks are. Prices get raised to meet supply and demand. Do you think the 315 bucks and 325 bucks we are seeing at many sites for ASUS NF4 SLI boards are because of RMA's??? Get a grip.
Newegg controls the lion's share of computer online shopping by part in large because of their track record of easy RMA's.
The real problem is the extremely flaky boards being rushed out the door and the fact some knuckleheads actually want to excuse sellers and resellers for pawning off crappy products on shoppers.
Bottom line there are many tacts NE can take to lessen RMA's on mobo's:
1. Have a knowledgeable person review each mobo order for other parts.
2. Include quick tip sheets with each mobo purchase.
3. Ask anyone requesting an RMA on a mobo tyo talk to a techie for a few mins and see if they can get the board working.
4. Provide a few warnings that the boards are recommended only for serious enthusiasts and computer professionals not end users.
Monarch currently has a MUCH better means of dealing with mobo orders. Because of that they'll get my 315 for the A8N-SLI. I'd rather pay more for a board that works and was tested than less for a boat anchor.