Then I am afraid I can not help you further by myself. I guess that you have configured langouste wrong. There is a guide you can use here: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1037125476#post1037125476 and a lot more here: http://hardforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=133
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
-
Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Newbie needs help with it 6274
- Thread starter Thomas R
- Start date
if you start langouste with the -D flag, it is running in daemon mode, which is why you don't see the first terminal output.
Right now, I would probably recommend disabling langouste and trying to send your completed units with the -send all flag:
Take as many variables out of the equation as you can until you get units to download and upload correctly.
Right now, I would probably recommend disabling langouste and trying to send your completed units with the -send all flag:
Code:
./fah6 -send allThis morning I´ve tried to send the WU´s about stopping the terminal with fah;
rename the WU 5 to 1 and start fah; than stop fah; rename WU 6 to 1 and start fah; and so on....
No luck with this.
(The tip with ./fah6 -send all comes to late)
And langouste starts with the -D flag.
Than I deleted again machinedependent.dat, queue.dat, work-folder and a3-Core.
Made a restart and started fah again and what happens?
Downloading core_a3 !!!
I´ve shut down the machine and think F@H is not for me.
I´ll try to format the HDD and install Windows. Than with BOINC any other project.
F@H and Linux are to heavy for me. They are waisting my time.
rename the WU 5 to 1 and start fah; than stop fah; rename WU 6 to 1 and start fah; and so on....
No luck with this.
(The tip with ./fah6 -send all comes to late)
And langouste starts with the -D flag.
Than I deleted again machinedependent.dat, queue.dat, work-folder and a3-Core.
Made a restart and started fah again and what happens?
Downloading core_a3 !!!
I´ve shut down the machine and think F@H is not for me.
I´ll try to format the HDD and install Windows. Than with BOINC any other project.
F@H and Linux are to heavy for me. They are waisting my time.
IIRC, normal Windows isn't going to see more than 2 CPU's.
Have you tried just loading the FAH 7.3.6 Linux from folding.stanford.edu? That's what I would start with, and as you get the machine running good, then do the CLI Musky install. For the 7.3.6 you will have EDIT the CPU slot in the FAHControl and ADD the -bigadv flag.
Don't give up. FAH is a worthy project, but it can be a PITA.
Have you tried just loading the FAH 7.3.6 Linux from folding.stanford.edu? That's what I would start with, and as you get the machine running good, then do the CLI Musky install. For the 7.3.6 you will have EDIT the CPU slot in the FAHControl and ADD the -bigadv flag.
Don't give up. FAH is a worthy project, but it can be a PITA.
Last edited:
PS - The Musky Install WILL work. I just did 5 quad CPU machines, with no problem but it loading SMP's at first. But all the puzzle pieces must be in the box.
But I understand the frustration when you have a lot of time, effort, and money tied up and aren't getting results. That's why I suggested 7.3.6 install. Once you start making big points, you will smile again.
But I understand the frustration when you have a lot of time, effort, and money tied up and aren't getting results. That's why I suggested 7.3.6 install. Once you start making big points, you will smile again.
tjmagneto
[H]ard DCOTM x2
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,299
Tear walks in with a silver plate on his hand -- Right here, Sir.
How can I disable langouste, without demaging any other process?
If you do want to use Langouste -- just keep it running and make sure you start it
in /etc/rc.local (above exit 0 line), like this (replace username with your Linux user
name):
If you do not want to use Langouste -- just stop the client, run ./fah6 -configonly
and disable proxy use.
For details: http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1037125476&postcount=5
in /etc/rc.local (above exit 0 line), like this (replace username with your Linux user
name):
Code:
sudo -u [b]username[/b] langouste3 -l 8880 -DIf you do not want to use Langouste -- just stop the client, run ./fah6 -configonly
and disable proxy use.
For details: http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1037125476&postcount=5
Hmmm...... I´m not sure of the frequency my CPU´s are running.
I´ve set: "sudo tpc -psmax 1"
The frequency should be at 2500MHz.
If I use "cpufreq-info" it show´s, that the current frequency is at 2000MHz with a possible maximum from 2200MHz.
Can you show me, how I can read the real running frequency?
EDIT:
Found it!
Installing OCNG-Utils
sudo clockspeed
CPU´s are running at 2500.32MHz
I´ve set: "sudo tpc -psmax 1"
The frequency should be at 2500MHz.
If I use "cpufreq-info" it show´s, that the current frequency is at 2000MHz with a possible maximum from 2200MHz.
Can you show me, how I can read the real running frequency?
EDIT:
Found it!
Installing OCNG-Utils
sudo clockspeed
CPU´s are running at 2500.32MHz
Last edited:
New problems again........Can´t get connected to the server!
Two finished units are in the work-folder. I get this massage:
[11:55:52] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[11:55:52] (128.143.199.97:80)
[11:55:52] Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[11:55:52] + Sent 0 of 1 completed units to the server
[11:55:52] - Autosend completed
[12:00:06] Completed 197500 out
@musky
To use your tip - have I to disable langouste or is the command -send all usable with running langouste?
If not - How can I disable langouste?
And - at first I have to exit ./fah6 - than I open a new terminal an change to the fah-folder. Than only give in ./fah6 - send all ????
Two finished units are in the work-folder. I get this massage:
[11:55:52] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[11:55:52] (128.143.199.97:80)
[11:55:52] Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[11:55:52] + Sent 0 of 1 completed units to the server
[11:55:52] - Autosend completed
[12:00:06] Completed 197500 out
@musky
To use your tip - have I to disable langouste or is the command -send all usable with running langouste?
If not - How can I disable langouste?
And - at first I have to exit ./fah6 - than I open a new terminal an change to the fah-folder. Than only give in ./fah6 - send all ????
I had five ready WU´s in the work-folder.
OK - I could not solve the problem!
I´ve done as tear has written.
The rig was sending data to stanford over hours. I´ve seen this with etherape.
In sum a total of 248MB has been sent to stanford.
Than, about seven hours ago I started the process, the client stopped with this report:
After this I deleted the work-folder with the five ready WU´s, queue.dat and machinedependent.dat, shut down the rig and started new with self-started langouste.
After it fits the first WU it looks like the same problem, but after a few hours the WU was sent.
The second WU was ready eleven hours ago, and the same problem appears:
After six hours another try:
The "wuresults.dat"-file from this WU I can see in my work-folder.
So I could not believe that it is sent to stanford. (The stats say the same)
Somehow I can not believe that the problem is to search at my side.
What should or could I do????
OK - I could not solve the problem!
I´ve done as tear has written.
The rig was sending data to stanford over hours. I´ve seen this with etherape.
In sum a total of 248MB has been sent to stanford.
Than, about seven hours ago I started the process, the client stopped with this report:
After this I deleted the work-folder with the five ready WU´s, queue.dat and machinedependent.dat, shut down the rig and started new with self-started langouste.
After it fits the first WU it looks like the same problem, but after a few hours the WU was sent.
The second WU was ready eleven hours ago, and the same problem appears:
After six hours another try:
The "wuresults.dat"-file from this WU I can see in my work-folder.
So I could not believe that it is sent to stanford. (The stats say the same)
Somehow I can not believe that the problem is to search at my side.
What should or could I do????
Try finding a pattern. Did the units you're trying to return come from same or different servers?
Run ./fah6 -queueinfo to get more information about that.
If different servers -- I'd genuinely look into firewall or similar issue (at your end).
Also, paste complete log from ./fah6 -send all [make sure you're not folding as you run it].
Run ./fah6 -queueinfo to get more information about that.
If different servers -- I'd genuinely look into firewall or similar issue (at your end).
Also, paste complete log from ./fah6 -send all [make sure you're not folding as you run it].
I can´t tell you if the units come from the same or different server.
How or where can I proof this?
Only the server where the units are sent to, is the same.
Or is it the server-ip on the pic?
Because this is the ip where the client tries to send.
About the firewall:
Is Ubuntu comming with a integrated firewall?
I haven´t seen a firewall till yet!
The complete log from ./fah6 - send all I can post you tomorrow.
How or where can I proof this?
Only the server where the units are sent to, is the same.
Or is it the server-ip on the pic?
Because this is the ip where the client tries to send.
About the firewall:
Is Ubuntu comming with a integrated firewall?
I haven´t seen a firewall till yet!
The complete log from ./fah6 - send all I can post you tomorrow.
./fah6 -queueinfo
Yes. Server is in the pic. Are these all of the problematic units?
The reason I'm asking is because I've seen another IP address in the snippets you've pasted: 128.143.199.97.
Ubuntu indeed includes a firewall but I'm fairly certain it's disabled by default.
I'm talking about [possibly] some device in your network [like your access router]
that's doing this [== not embedded Ubuntu firewall].
Do you have multiple systems in this location? Do all of them suffer from this issue?
Yes - there are five systems in this location. One of them (this one I write now) has problems to. But it is the same: one time it is no problem to send the units. The next day it is´nt possible to send a unit.
The other two systems who run for F@H have no problems!
That is awfully long.
You should work on narrowing down the cause of the issue using something else than FAH
as it's unlikely that FAH backoffice is the problem.
Check quality of connection in your LAN.
These two should really be first order of business:
1. Transferring big (say... 1GB) file in or out of the problematic machine.
  See if you get appropriate speeds. With 100Mbps it should be about 10-11MB/s. With GigE
  you may be limited by your HDDs -- these days I would expect no less than 30MB/s.
2. Running ping -f from the problematic machine to your LAN router, then checking for packet losses
  -- there shouldn't be any (EDIT: well, perhaps a handful at the most).
You could also check 'dmesg' output for excessive link up/down messages.
As well as speculatively switch to another LAN port on the board (if you have more than one port).
Could replace the cable , too.
You should work on narrowing down the cause of the issue using something else than FAH
as it's unlikely that FAH backoffice is the problem.
Check quality of connection in your LAN.
These two should really be first order of business:
1. Transferring big (say... 1GB) file in or out of the problematic machine.
  See if you get appropriate speeds. With 100Mbps it should be about 10-11MB/s. With GigE
  you may be limited by your HDDs -- these days I would expect no less than 30MB/s.
2. Running ping -f from the problematic machine to your LAN router, then checking for packet losses
  -- there shouldn't be any (EDIT: well, perhaps a handful at the most).
You could also check 'dmesg' output for excessive link up/down messages.
As well as speculatively switch to another LAN port on the board (if you have more than one port).
Could replace the cable , too.
Last edited:
Is there any atribute for ping -f I must write?
Started a test-download with a 1GB-File:
Maximum speed with 252Kb/s (This is the maximum from my Internet-connection)
Can not start an upload because I have no email or FTP-programm installed here (and I dont know how to do this in linux....)
When I give in the command "dmesg -d" it takes a milli-second and there come a lot of output. Can not copy and paste it - it is to long.
A internet-speedtest for DSL shows perfect results.
Started a test-download with a 1GB-File:
Maximum speed with 252Kb/s (This is the maximum from my Internet-connection)
Can not start an upload because I have no email or FTP-programm installed here (and I dont know how to do this in linux....)
When I give in the command "dmesg -d" it takes a milli-second and there come a lot of output. Can not copy and paste it - it is to long.
A internet-speedtest for DSL shows perfect results.
ping -f should be run as root -- prepend the command with sudo if you're on Ubuntu.
Let it run for 30-60 seconds, then interrupt with Ctrl+C.
When I said download/upload test, I meant testing of your LAN == for instance, pulling a file from
a(nother) machine in your LAN.
About dmesg -- just examine it and see if there are excessive messages
suggesting Ethernet link going up/down, for instance, something similar to:
Let it run for 30-60 seconds, then interrupt with Ctrl+C.
When I said download/upload test, I meant testing of your LAN == for instance, pulling a file from
a(nother) machine in your LAN.
About dmesg -- just examine it and see if there are excessive messages
suggesting Ethernet link going up/down, for instance, something similar to:
Code:
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link becomes ready
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link becomes readyOK - sudo ping -f:
LAN Upload/Download:
From Windows-PC to Linux-PC:
File with 2,7GB in 4min36sec
From Linux-PC to Windows-PC:
File with 2,7GB in 5min45sec
dmesg:
Anything like this?
Update:
The last unit goes out without any issue.
I dont know if this is helpfull...?!
Update Sunday:
The last three units are going out without any issue!
LAN Upload/Download:
From Windows-PC to Linux-PC:
File with 2,7GB in 4min36sec
From Linux-PC to Windows-PC:
File with 2,7GB in 5min45sec
dmesg:
Anything like this?
Update:
The last unit goes out without any issue.
I dont know if this is helpfull...?!
Update Sunday:
The last three units are going out without any issue!
Last edited: