New Site, comments on the Folding bit requested...

Status
Not open for further replies.

sharp

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Messages
1,267
Good Morning Everybody

The new site for the business is up. That is a good thing. The old one was reasonable to look at, but seriously awful for search engines. Something I'd like your input on (as I have to have SOME reason to show off the much improved site).. the Folding text on this page

**Taken care of** Thank you [H]

I have some questions on how to improve the site (and fix somethings I know are wrong, but alas, I'm not a web person of any skill)... look in the webmaster section if you can help a guy out.

I still have a couple more large projects I have to get finished before I can play. Did you know a good duplexing scanner that creates searchable PDF files is only $350? And how much is the video card I want? ..guess which one I just bought.

First we take care of clients, then we buy toys. First we take care of clients, then we buy toys...

Have a great morning.

 
The site looks pretty good. I haven't read everything yet. I'd reread it for spelling errors and extra words you didn't mean to put into the sentences. I noticed 1 right away on the first page, I'll post it up tomorrow, since I'm going to bed now 3rd section down 1st or second sentence in paragraph. Also the 2 images on the homepage don't really fit with your site -- and they should be the same width atleast. I do love the scenery though, I'm an outdoors guy, I just think they don't lend much to this type of site. Good night everyone.
 
MN Scout.. Thanks, I think I've changed the part that read poorly.

..SM... "we'll keep that in mind" for future revisions.

js
 
any takers regarding teh point of teh post... namely the Folding@Home section of the page? Thoughts, revisions, etc...

sharp
 
You might want to change the wording of "special software" to something more like "a small client d/l that will use your idle cpu cycles to help find a cure"........or something to that effect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top