Unknown-One
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,909
You're making statements that you claim I said, when in reality I've said no such thing. How is that not putting words in my mouth?No words are being placed in your mouth.
It's now obvious you aren't even reading my posts. You've demonstrated, twice in a row, a lack of reading comprehension. I have indeed made plenty of valid points and criticisms, as well as explainations for my conclusions; let me quote a chunk of my first post on the matter...You haven't made any points. You've simply taken the position that the device is useless
You're saying I didn't make any points in the above? Would you like it in bulleted list format?Touch gestures are great when all you have available to you for user input is a touchscreen, they let you use extra fingers and motions to make up for the lack of physical buttons. Putting a touch interface on the back of a mouse, however, goes completely against the general design philosophy for both technologies.
Think about it for a second; a touch surface needs to be stationary so that objects can move along its surface, while a mouse is designed to be as easy to move as possible. So right off the bat there's a conflict. You either have to make the mouse harder to move (bad for general mouse use) or you force the user to hold the mouse in place, in some fashion, in order to use the touch features.
The Magic Mouse also forces users to change modes between grasping the mouse for pointer movement, and hovering over the mouse for touch input, slowing down workflow. A normal 5 button mouse has all of its buttons directly under the fingertips at all times, giving immediate access to all functions.
Now, besides the design issues, there's also the sheer pointlessness of it all. A 5 button mouse has 5 buttons as well as a scroll wheel. This is the same number of potential inputs the magic mouse has (5 fingers), though because you have to hold the mouse in place (and because the surface is so small), using 5 fingers is almost never an option for it. The obvious handicap this has left the Magic Mouse with, is that it doesn't appear to have any middle-click - not only does it not add any functionality, it removes some.
If your best defense for bad press it "leave it alone! stop reviewing it negatively!" and "don't buy it" then this product really is off to a bad start.
I'm not dismissing it. I'm completely open to any reasonable claims of extra functionality that I might have overlooked. You still have yet to actually bring up any merits of the Magic Mouse, instead choosing to attack me for my criticism of it...why are you trying so hard to silence me?It's one thing to ask what the Magic Mouse offers; it's another to completely dismiss it as pointless.