• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

New folder i7 3820

tcclaviger

n00b
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
55
Currently have my rig setup as follows:

i7 3820 - 4.9 ghz
16GB DDR 3, 2044 mhz, 9-11-10-28-1t
2x 6870 1060core/1125ram

Have F@H setup to run SMP -7, and 2 GPU units, then adjusted the "Percent CPU Usage" to 87%, so that 1 core can still run both GPU projects.

My first WU for the CPU I have gotten is a PRCG 7610 for SMP and 11293 for both GPUs.

SMP
Estimated TPF SMP: 7min58sec
Estimated TPF GPU: 3min07sec (x2 of course)

Does this seem right for my hardware? I feel it seems lower than it should be, but I have nothing to compare to except random forum posts I can find on forums. The CPU is stable, the GPUs are stable and it demolishes any and every benchmark I have thrown at it.

9.79 Cinebench

This was before the bump to 4.9ghz, obviously.
9-11-10-28-1Tat2022.jpg
 
Last edited:
Looks right to me.

Be careful running -smp 7. Some of the newer WU freak out with that number of cores. Just keep an eye out for any failed WU. If you get some, switch to SMP 6 or 8
 
The 7610 are some of the longer slog smp WUs around. Looks good.
 
I will have to pull up my stats. Honestly with radeon 6800's I would say dont bother folding on them and just go full hog on the CPU. You will definitely improve PPD/W and possibly even improve overall PPD as well.
 
I will have to pull up my stats. Honestly with radeon 6800's I would say dont bother folding on them and just go full hog on the CPU. You will definitely improve PPD/W and possibly even improve overall PPD as well.

This is the way I would go. But if you have cheap/free power, go for it!
 
Thanks guys. I will try both, with and without the GPUs crunching each way for a couple days see what I get overall.

Power cost isn't an issue for me thankfully.
 
if by PRCG 7610 you mean project P7610 your TPF seems off.
My i5-2500K @ 4.5GHz (Nobby) has a TPF of around 4m45s and a Q6600 @ 3GHz (mustrum) is around 8m30s, both under win7



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
You do not need to cpu adjust if you are running smp -7, cause that leaves 1 core free.
 
Thanks for the heads up on the TPF times. After disabling the GPU slots and setting 8/100% the TPF times are down to 3min05sec :p

Now to find a project with very little CPU overhead that is GPU only.
 
Thanks for the heads up on the TPF times. After disabling the GPU slots and setting 8/100% the TPF times are down to 3min05sec :p

Now to find a project with very little CPU overhead that is GPU only.

I think one of the DC commandos should fill you in where your ATI cards can make some waves ;)
 
I was doing RC5-72, aka dnetc but decided that this was far more worth of time than a simple key brute force effort.
 
not too sure bout the science, but for creating some waves you with the ATi's you could always check out the [H] team on Collatz Conjecture (which is running under BOINC), but I think the guys in the DC Vault thread here on the forums know more about that one.
I am running that on my measly 5770 and it doesn't seem to impact the CPU that much.
 
If you have problems with smp 7 try smp 6 and a uniproc slot - no point in wasting spare resources:D
 
I have a 7611 in my database, getting the following on a 4Ghz i7 920


Min. Time / Frame : 00:04:00 - 20,594.5 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:05:16 - 13,631.3 PPD
 
Back
Top