new crysis patch

A

AMD_Gamer

Fully [H]
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
18,287
i think this new patch or the new nvidia drivers may have un fucked crysis, it seems that it plays ALOT smoother now, although i do not notice any FPS increase it does not slow down as much in big firefights and when running around i am getting 15 fps but it feels very playable,

am i the only one feeling this?

also for some reason in the video settings if i set everything to HIGH it changes things back to custom it is kinda strange, i completely uninstalled then reinstalled to make sure i did not after any of the custom config crap anymore?
 
I read notes on one site and it didn't say anything about performance updates, but I read another and it said fixed some memory leaks. Those memory leak fixes is probably it, less cacheing is going to equal a more smoother game play.
 
ok i went to load up that ice level and completely unplayable , i had to lower the shader effects to LOW and its fun, only have performance trouble in the ice level
 
grifter_66 said:
Are you drunk?
Click to expand...

no..... after this patch everything is playable at the level i want it to be,

now this was the first time i loaded up a ice level from a save game config i downloaded because after i was happy with the jungle performance i wanted to test out the ice levels,

i want to get performance where i want it to be so i can play through without having to tweak when i get to a certain area
 
btw my settings are

Q6600 ( stock)
8800gtx (stock)
IP35PRO
4GB RAM
Vista64
latest nvidia beta drivers( claim to be good with the crysis patch)

all settings set to high except after setting it to high crysis changes most of the settings to custom? i dont get it
 
AMD_Gamer said:
btw my settings are

Q6600 ( stock)
8800gtx (stock)
IP35PRO
4GB RAM
Vista64
latest nvidia beta drivers( claim to be good with the crysis patch)

all settings set to high except after setting it to high crysis changes most of the settings to custom? i dont get it
Click to expand...

latest as in the 169.44 beta's? because the number matters here, 'latest' won't do.
 
I dont know how the patch translates for the actual game but here are the disappointing gpu benchmark results. These were ran on sig rig with 8600gt at 650/1700 at 1024x768 all medium settings and 0 AA, 8 AF.

Crysis 1.0.................... 28.67 FPS

Crysis 1.2.................... 25.63 FPS

Crysis 1.2 with 169.44... 25.83 FPS
 
That crysis benchmark performance doesnt translate to actual gameplay. I wouldnt worry too much about it. I've tested both 3870x2 and a 8800 gts g92 to compare the two.
 
i think it changes it to custom when you have a custom config.
does it to mine too, and only after i started fuckin around with custom configs.


one thing i will say though, 30 fps in this game feels like 60 in any other game.
its amazing what games my computer will play even at 1900/1440 8 aniso, ssaa (assasins creed) .. solid 60 fps... and it has higher requirements then crysis!
 
awwww man i just downloaded the 1.1 patch the other day :~(

I hope its on my ISP's mirror cas my ADSL2 is shaped until the 12th

aw and i'm on 169.25 where have i been? in a ditch :p

I'm goin @ 18-28fps DX10 / Very High / 1680x1050...

but its wayyy more playable on HIGH unfortunately...


aww they have 169.44 beta but no v1.2 patch...
 
I install crysis patch 1.2 last night and now the game is having a problem when loading.

It would load up to 13/14% and then jump to 100%.

The screen load with missing tree, people, etc.

The only thing i think of is the mod i installed for very high setting in window xp.
 
I am running them now. So far they seem very stable. IQ is fantastic as well. All control panel options that I have needed are fully functioning and latest nhancer beta works well with them too. Definitely keepers for me unless something creeps up I am not liking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top