Hey folks. My first build since 2008. Trying to keep the budget as close to $1,000.00 as possible. PC will be for general use, with some higher-end gaming thrown in. I do intend to overclock the CPU and GPU.
Because this is my first build in almost 5 years, I have had some catching up to do and have spent the better part of the last 2 months doing some pretty extensive research. But my level of knowledge is admittedly pretty poor, so take it easy on me if some of my choices/ questions seem silly.
I have researched extensively and was very close to an AMD system based on an FX-8350 proc. However, the consensus from all I have read is that an Intel system is just better, especially for a general use home PC. It seems a system based on an 2500K is good for now and the next couple of years at least. I would prefer to have this system last for a while with an upgrade to the CPU if necessary a few years down the line. Frankly, my current system is based on an E6600 OC'd to 3.2 ghz and still runs pretty strong and has been great for 4+ years.
I like Windows 8 and that will be the OS.
I have had to make a few sacrifices to keep the machine close to budget.
So then, herewith is what I have chosen:
The whole shebang comes in at $1,087.00.
The big sacrifice I had to make to keep the machine cost down was no dedicated SSD. I would prefer one SSD to keep all my data on but we are talking 512GB = $400.00. I don't like the sound of an OS only SSD as it seems like a lot of work to have stuff thrown across 2+ drives. The performance I am getting out of the ScanDisk cache drive now is pretty spiffy so I went with a traditional HDD with the ScanDisk as a cache drive. Do you think a Raid set-up with 2 HDD's in Raid 0 would be worth the cost of a 2nd Seagate drive?
Waddya think?
Because this is my first build in almost 5 years, I have had some catching up to do and have spent the better part of the last 2 months doing some pretty extensive research. But my level of knowledge is admittedly pretty poor, so take it easy on me if some of my choices/ questions seem silly.
I have researched extensively and was very close to an AMD system based on an FX-8350 proc. However, the consensus from all I have read is that an Intel system is just better, especially for a general use home PC. It seems a system based on an 2500K is good for now and the next couple of years at least. I would prefer to have this system last for a while with an upgrade to the CPU if necessary a few years down the line. Frankly, my current system is based on an E6600 OC'd to 3.2 ghz and still runs pretty strong and has been great for 4+ years.
I like Windows 8 and that will be the OS.
I have had to make a few sacrifices to keep the machine close to budget.
So then, herewith is what I have chosen:
- Intel Core i5-2500K Sandy Bridge ($199.00)
- ASRock Z77 Extreme4 ($127.00)
- COOLER MASTER Hyper 212 Plus ($30.00)
- GeIL Black Dragon 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 ($70.00)
- Antec High Current Gamer Series HCG-750 750W Certified 80 PLUS BRONZE (100.00)
- Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 1TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s ($90.00)
- SanDisk ReadyCache SDSSDRC-032G-G26 2.5" 32GB (already have this - will use as a cache drive)
- Western Digital My Passport 1TB USB 3.0 Red External Hard Drive (already have this- external data back-up)
- XFX Double D FX-787A-CDFC Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 2GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 ($229.00 with 4 free games - FC3, MOH: WF, Dirt 3, TwoWorlds)
- ASUS 24X DVD Burner ($20.00)
- Fractal Design Define R4 with Window Black Pearl Silent ATX Mid Tower Case ($120.00 - the "silent" part is very appealing. My current rig sounds like a jet.)
- Creative X-FI Xtreme Gamer (already have)
- Microsoft Windows 8 64-bit (Full Version) - OEM ($100.00)
The whole shebang comes in at $1,087.00.
The big sacrifice I had to make to keep the machine cost down was no dedicated SSD. I would prefer one SSD to keep all my data on but we are talking 512GB = $400.00. I don't like the sound of an OS only SSD as it seems like a lot of work to have stuff thrown across 2+ drives. The performance I am getting out of the ScanDisk cache drive now is pretty spiffy so I went with a traditional HDD with the ScanDisk as a cache drive. Do you think a Raid set-up with 2 HDD's in Raid 0 would be worth the cost of a 2nd Seagate drive?
Waddya think?
Last edited: