Sep 9, 2008 #1 K Kendrak [H]ard|DCer of the Year 2009 Joined Aug 29, 2001 Messages 21,141 Link Is anyone else hoping that they have all or most of their shaders? These could be folding holy gails
Link Is anyone else hoping that they have all or most of their shaders? These could be folding holy gails
Sep 9, 2008 #2 V Vediovus Gawd Joined Jun 19, 2008 Messages 698 They are cheap too. It will be interesting to see how they do when they hit the streets.
Sep 9, 2008 #3 I IronBits Limp Gawd Joined Jun 24, 2001 Messages 154 http://www.digitimes.com/mobos/a20080909PD205.html Indeed!
Sep 9, 2008 #4 O oraldlight Limp Gawd Joined Feb 12, 2007 Messages 490 Something just doesn't seem right about the pricing. Seems too cheap. Time will tell. However, if they do have massive shader counts, I'll be seriously looking at a few of them for my folding garden.
Something just doesn't seem right about the pricing. Seems too cheap. Time will tell. However, if they do have massive shader counts, I'll be seriously looking at a few of them for my folding garden.
Sep 9, 2008 #5 M metallicafan [H]ard|DCer of the Month - May 2010 Joined Mar 30, 2005 Messages 2,205 That 4670 could be a mean folder for the money if it doesnt lose too many SPs from the 4870. I still have one empty graphics slot!
That 4670 could be a mean folder for the money if it doesnt lose too many SPs from the 4870. I still have one empty graphics slot!
Sep 9, 2008 #6 E elleana 2[H]4U Joined Apr 15, 2006 Messages 2,590 DDR2? Isn't DDR3 standard on all new cards? Any particular reason why they are stepping backwards?
Sep 9, 2008 #7 M metallicafan [H]ard|DCer of the Month - May 2010 Joined Mar 30, 2005 Messages 2,205 Because they can make really cheap cards with DDR2. Also because the cheaper GPUs aren't powerful enough to take advantage of lots of high speed RAM making it a moot point.
Because they can make really cheap cards with DDR2. Also because the cheaper GPUs aren't powerful enough to take advantage of lots of high speed RAM making it a moot point.
Sep 10, 2008 #8 C cereal_killer24 Limp Gawd Joined Nov 26, 2005 Messages 241 http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1033013351#post1033013351 Saw that and thought I'd highlight it in D/C forum
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1033013351#post1033013351 Saw that and thought I'd highlight it in D/C forum
Sep 10, 2008 #9 K Kendrak [H]ard|DCer of the Year 2009 Joined Aug 29, 2001 Messages 21,141 Best I can figure the 4670 should get ~ 1600+ ppd. They way I figured a 3650 has 120 stream procs and gets 600 ppd. The 4670 has 320 stream procs. 600 x 2.7 = 1620 Now we can probably add in some extra points for a faster card. I'm thinking It will be a sub 2k ppd card. Even with the point downtick the 8800GS is still a bit better
Best I can figure the 4670 should get ~ 1600+ ppd. They way I figured a 3650 has 120 stream procs and gets 600 ppd. The 4670 has 320 stream procs. 600 x 2.7 = 1620 Now we can probably add in some extra points for a faster card. I'm thinking It will be a sub 2k ppd card. Even with the point downtick the 8800GS is still a bit better