Alright I figure its time to build a new comp before I go back to school.
My system is:
dual mp 2400's on an msi k7d master-L
1 gig pc 2100 ddr ecc/reg ram
crappy vid card.
I'm not too much of a gamer, but I've already found the vid card I think i'm going to get (PNY geforce 7600 GT): http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814133150
I'm trying to stay under the 150.00 range for a vid card. I figure that will be more than ample to play a few games.
Now here's my big dilema.. Its been a while (4 years) since I've done the whole build a new computer bit - so i'm really out of date with technology.
I'm comparing apples to oranges here, but would like a few things cleared up.
First off, my main uses for the computer are: listening to music, excel, access, browing web, typing papers, movies, and occasionally converting dvds.
So with that being said. Whats the difference between intel/amd as far as processors and mobos go?
Intel has (specing the D930)
dual core, 2x2meg L2 cache, 3.0 ghz operating frequency, 24+32k L1 cache, no HT support).
I was thinking the foxconn 975aa mobo along with 2x 512 meg ddr2 667 patriot ram..
The mobo says 1066/800 fsb.
Now, for amd..
amd 64x2 4400+
Dual core, 2x1 meg L2 cache, 2.2 ghz operating frequency, 128+128 L1 cache, 2000 mhz HT)
I was thinking DFO lanparty UT..
Now i see it says the fsb is 1000 mhz, and the ram is only regular ddr 400..
So, in reality, which would be the better of the 2 systems to go with?
What features on a processor are affected by what things?
Intel has less L1 cache, but more L2 cache (What uses the cache, and which is better to have more of?) the ram is also much faster (ddr compared to ddr2)...
What is up with AMD's 2000 mhz HT? why does the motherboard for amd only use 1000 mhz? And last but not least why does the AMD motherboards only use ddr 400 still?
I guess i'm just confused as to why the Intel looks better in some ways yet AMD in others..
Can someone clear this up for me?
I won't be doing any cad work, movie editing, or anything like that anytime soon. Only think I might be doing would be using photoshop (not in the near future)...
So which would be better for my tasks? I am a multi tasker, but only if i'm browing the web with multiple windows open, listening to music, and perhaps doing some calculations or something with excel?
Also, I'm dead set on the processors I've picked out, as well as the vid card.
Any reason not to get the foxconn mobo and patriot ram if i go that route?
What about amd? Would the Lanparty UT be a stable board?
Thanks.
Stewie
My system is:
dual mp 2400's on an msi k7d master-L
1 gig pc 2100 ddr ecc/reg ram
crappy vid card.
I'm not too much of a gamer, but I've already found the vid card I think i'm going to get (PNY geforce 7600 GT): http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814133150
I'm trying to stay under the 150.00 range for a vid card. I figure that will be more than ample to play a few games.
Now here's my big dilema.. Its been a while (4 years) since I've done the whole build a new computer bit - so i'm really out of date with technology.
I'm comparing apples to oranges here, but would like a few things cleared up.
First off, my main uses for the computer are: listening to music, excel, access, browing web, typing papers, movies, and occasionally converting dvds.
So with that being said. Whats the difference between intel/amd as far as processors and mobos go?
Intel has (specing the D930)
dual core, 2x2meg L2 cache, 3.0 ghz operating frequency, 24+32k L1 cache, no HT support).
I was thinking the foxconn 975aa mobo along with 2x 512 meg ddr2 667 patriot ram..
The mobo says 1066/800 fsb.
Now, for amd..
amd 64x2 4400+
Dual core, 2x1 meg L2 cache, 2.2 ghz operating frequency, 128+128 L1 cache, 2000 mhz HT)
I was thinking DFO lanparty UT..
Now i see it says the fsb is 1000 mhz, and the ram is only regular ddr 400..
So, in reality, which would be the better of the 2 systems to go with?
What features on a processor are affected by what things?
Intel has less L1 cache, but more L2 cache (What uses the cache, and which is better to have more of?) the ram is also much faster (ddr compared to ddr2)...
What is up with AMD's 2000 mhz HT? why does the motherboard for amd only use 1000 mhz? And last but not least why does the AMD motherboards only use ddr 400 still?
I guess i'm just confused as to why the Intel looks better in some ways yet AMD in others..
Can someone clear this up for me?
I won't be doing any cad work, movie editing, or anything like that anytime soon. Only think I might be doing would be using photoshop (not in the near future)...
So which would be better for my tasks? I am a multi tasker, but only if i'm browing the web with multiple windows open, listening to music, and perhaps doing some calculations or something with excel?
Also, I'm dead set on the processors I've picked out, as well as the vid card.
Any reason not to get the foxconn mobo and patriot ram if i go that route?
What about amd? Would the Lanparty UT be a stable board?
Thanks.
Stewie