OrangeWolf
Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2011
- Messages
- 884
I've been working on my first build and I've finally gotten most everything ordered except the video card -- I had last minute reservations.
I don't want to spend more than $200 on a graphics card because (1) I think the Radeon 6850 will play everything I want decently at 1920x1080, (2) My professional programs are probably less demanding than games on the GPU and (3) I'm passing this computer to my parents in 1-2 years and they probably don't need more than integrated graphics.
Question:
How much of a performance decrease would I notice playing at 1920x1080 going from a Radeon 6850 to something like a GeForce 460 768MB?
Specifically I was thinking about trying to get a deal on something in the <$130 range ($50 cheaper than the 6850 I planned to buy) -- I've seen some of those 768MB cards in the $100-120 range recently -- and there is something in HOTDeals right now for the 460 1GB for $120.
Other pertinent information:
Quality is important too -- this card will be in use for 5 years or so. I don't want to get a "cheap" brand/card. Quiet is preferable. I am skeptical of Mail-in Rebates and would prefer avoiding them, though this may not be feasible. Main games I play or intend to play are WoW, SC2, Dragon Age, Oblivion, Civ5, perhaps Diablo3. Currently I run my 1920x1080 monitor with my laptop graphics card (256MB Quadro FX 570m) and play games on Low-Fair. Given that this is true I am at a loss to understand why people say that you need a 1GB card to run a monitor at 1920x1080 -- I'm not saying they're wrong to say that, I just don't understand it (if someone could enlighten me that'd be great).
Is it best for me to just bite the bullet and pick up the Radeon 6850 in my original build for quality/performance or would I really even notice stepping down and saving $50?
Thanks!
Edit: I should add that I do not intend to Overclock.
I don't want to spend more than $200 on a graphics card because (1) I think the Radeon 6850 will play everything I want decently at 1920x1080, (2) My professional programs are probably less demanding than games on the GPU and (3) I'm passing this computer to my parents in 1-2 years and they probably don't need more than integrated graphics.
Question:
How much of a performance decrease would I notice playing at 1920x1080 going from a Radeon 6850 to something like a GeForce 460 768MB?
Specifically I was thinking about trying to get a deal on something in the <$130 range ($50 cheaper than the 6850 I planned to buy) -- I've seen some of those 768MB cards in the $100-120 range recently -- and there is something in HOTDeals right now for the 460 1GB for $120.
Other pertinent information:
Quality is important too -- this card will be in use for 5 years or so. I don't want to get a "cheap" brand/card. Quiet is preferable. I am skeptical of Mail-in Rebates and would prefer avoiding them, though this may not be feasible. Main games I play or intend to play are WoW, SC2, Dragon Age, Oblivion, Civ5, perhaps Diablo3. Currently I run my 1920x1080 monitor with my laptop graphics card (256MB Quadro FX 570m) and play games on Low-Fair. Given that this is true I am at a loss to understand why people say that you need a 1GB card to run a monitor at 1920x1080 -- I'm not saying they're wrong to say that, I just don't understand it (if someone could enlighten me that'd be great).
Is it best for me to just bite the bullet and pick up the Radeon 6850 in my original build for quality/performance or would I really even notice stepping down and saving $50?
Thanks!
Edit: I should add that I do not intend to Overclock.
Last edited: