My Site for Benchmarks

default size for the pictures of graphs in the ATI section makes them hard to read in firefox, they need to be re-sized.
 
the images are readable, but it would be better if you used the original picture size for the webpage instead of having them be links to the pictures (the full size is not that much larger then the clickable thumbnails)
 
I applaud the effort and appreciate the information. Stay with it! :)
 
Very nice site...very good point about the diff a driver can make. Welcome to our community! :)

Opera views it just fine btw! ;)
 
Nice site. It looks like there is some HD 4850 Crysis CF scaling on Very High? That's good to know... I thought there was like zero scaling in CF and Crysis.
 
i have always wondered this and never been able to find a place that tested just for this.

I usually just find one that I feel is the best and stick with it.
 
Ogilvy said:
Nice site. It looks like there is some HD 4850 Crysis CF scaling on Very High? That's good to know... I thought there was like zero scaling in CF and Crysis.
Click to expand...

yes i was surprised by that, i guess the gpu's need to be taxed very hard for crossfire scaling in crysis .
 
I'm looking for a site that has at least charts showing performance differences of all the new video cards, including the nVidia 200 series and the ATI 4800 series.

It needs to also go back to at least the GeForce 7800GTX.

Normally I turn to Toms Hardware for this, but their site is WOEFULLY out of date. The latest card they even list is the 8800GTX.

Thanks :)
 
TechLarry said:
I'm looking for a site that has at least charts showing performance differences of all the new video cards, including the nVidia 200 series and the ATI 4800 series.

It needs to also go back to at least the GeForce 7800GTX.

Normally I turn to Toms Hardware for this, but their site is WOEFULLY out of date. The latest card they even list is the 8800GTX.

Thanks :)
Click to expand...

hope i helped .
 
good stuff thanks for all the time youre taking to do this but from these charts its telling me i should go use the ati 8.6 drivers and not the hotfix. also can you test with the 8.7 beta
 
You do realize that changes in driver releases will affect different cards differently...right?
 
LstOfTheBrunnenG said:
You do realize that changes in driver releases will affect different cards differently...right?
Click to expand...

was this directed at because as far as i can tell visiontek on makes one 4850 which we both have unless you mean each and every single card manufacterd then no i did not know that
 
onedestinazn2 said:
was this directed at because as far as i can tell visiontek on makes one 4850 which we both have unless you mean each and every single card manufacterd then no i did not know that
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:

I said that because I noticed he was only testing nVidia drivers with a 9600GT. The time will come when optimizing for the 9600GT will be far from nVidia's priority, they'll be optimizing for GT200's successor or something like that. Optimizing for a GPU so different may actually hurt performance with an 9600GT.

I used to own a notebook with an FX5200 Go, and the general consensus was that there was a driver release which was the most optimized for these chips, and later releases for years afterward made performance on the FX5200 Goworse.
 
yeah but ive never heard of nvidia cards using catalyst 8.6 or the hotfix which is from his ati card drivers graphs
 
wolf2009 said:
wat res u running at ?
Click to expand...

2560x1600

The pictures aren't that large if you insist at keeping them at that size you need to edit them in some photo editing software and resize the resolution there. Having the browser resize them makes them look really bad, especially the text.
 
Frostex said:
2560x1600

The pictures aren't that large if you insist at keeping them at that size you need to edit them in some photo editing software and resize the resolution there. Having the browser resize them makes them look really bad, especially the text.
Click to expand...

i am running at 1280x1024 .

could u plz post a screen how the website looks on ur screen .

i have the graphs at max size that i can produced them. If i make them any larger , they will go out of the page , then it wont look symmmetric.
 
wolf2009 said:
i am running at 1280x1024 .

could u plz post a screen how the website looks on ur screen .

i have the graphs at max size that i can produced them. If i make them any larger , they will go out of the page , then it wont look symmmetric.
Click to expand...

I will when I get home, it looks OK on my 1440x900 at work.

You dont need to make the sizes of the images bigger on the screen...what I'm saying is that if you have a 100px x 100px image and you want to display that as 80px x 80px, rather than have the browser resize the image, open the 100x100 image up in some editing software like photoshop and save the image as 80x80.

Photoshop and other image applications are better at resizing images than browsers are.
 
You need to unlock the Frams in cod4. They are locked at 91. I see a 93, but thats a fluke too.
in the console type /com_maxfps 0
That will unlock your frames and run at whatever the highest is going to be. Right now you are limited to 91.
You can replace the 0 with any other number like. /com_maxfps 125
Also to show your frames in game the command is /cg_drawfps 1

I bet you get higher frames now :)
 
You get banned from a lot of punkbuster servers if your maxfps is higher than 125, just an interesting tidbit there.

:S
 
Frostex said:
You get banned from a lot of punkbuster servers if your maxfps is higher than 125, just an interesting tidbit there.

:S
Click to expand...

wow , thanks for telling me that. i would return it to normal before joining a server .
 
anybody know a fix fro removing framerat cap in et:quake wars , coz i'm thinking of adding that .
 
If you cant benchmark other video cards. one thing you can do is create a standard testing method that your site follows. i am sure other member here would test drivers on other cards for you and just give you the data for a little bit of credit.

so if you could get some more data about other common cards.
8800gt, 8800gts g90 and 92. 8800GTX 9800GTX GTX260/280 ect. each revision of the cards are bound to like one set of drivers over another.

would be a cool idea to develop some more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top