robman_rob
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2006
- Messages
- 273
Hey there,
I've been reading the benefits of having 2 or more hdd's in your system and I just want to run by you guys what I will later implement to see in your opinion, if it will actually do what I think it will do.
2 hard drives, I'll call them 1 and 2.
I'll partition the 1st, faster hd into 3 parts:
a small part for the OS (windows xp) and applications that run at startup (60 gb)?
a larger part for games and user starting applications (rest of hd)
another part for storage (25%)
on the 2nd disk, again 3 partitions,
a small part for the swap files for OS system and maybe some redirected temporary file folders (both of which I don't know how to do yet, maybe 40gb worth of space)
a middle partition for storage / programs (rest of hd)
a last part for storage (25%)
Would this utilize two hard disks to maximize performance? This is from reading about Zoned Bit Recording where the outter parts of the disk have higher sustained transfer rates (STR), so putting the OS and swap files there should lead to increased performance. Then the middle sections of the HD are for applications and games. The inner parts of the disk (the 3rd partitions) have the slowest STRs and such are meant for storage of data, such as music, movies, back up, etc.
lastly, any suggestions on what to do if I want to dual boot XP and Vista? I was not able to figure out a reasonable way to do dual booting like this.
thanks for any input.
ps. oh i don't want to raid 0, moreover I can not because my two hd's are different sizes.
I've been reading the benefits of having 2 or more hdd's in your system and I just want to run by you guys what I will later implement to see in your opinion, if it will actually do what I think it will do.
2 hard drives, I'll call them 1 and 2.
I'll partition the 1st, faster hd into 3 parts:
a small part for the OS (windows xp) and applications that run at startup (60 gb)?
a larger part for games and user starting applications (rest of hd)
another part for storage (25%)
on the 2nd disk, again 3 partitions,
a small part for the swap files for OS system and maybe some redirected temporary file folders (both of which I don't know how to do yet, maybe 40gb worth of space)
a middle partition for storage / programs (rest of hd)
a last part for storage (25%)
Would this utilize two hard disks to maximize performance? This is from reading about Zoned Bit Recording where the outter parts of the disk have higher sustained transfer rates (STR), so putting the OS and swap files there should lead to increased performance. Then the middle sections of the HD are for applications and games. The inner parts of the disk (the 3rd partitions) have the slowest STRs and such are meant for storage of data, such as music, movies, back up, etc.
lastly, any suggestions on what to do if I want to dual boot XP and Vista? I was not able to figure out a reasonable way to do dual booting like this.
thanks for any input.
ps. oh i don't want to raid 0, moreover I can not because my two hd's are different sizes.