I've been using 24 inch 1920x1200 monitors and a 30 inch 2560x1600 monitor. I just got a 27 inch 2560x1440 monitor (Asus Rog Swift) and kind of expected it to be sized in between these two monitor sizes. The 2560x1440 looks to be the same vertical size as my 24 inch monitors -- the only increase is in the horizontal dimension. I didn't account for the differences in aspect ratio. I guess 24 -> 27 if both are in 16:9 aspect ratio scales upward as you'd expect but not if the aspect ratio also changes.
I guess this website explains it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_size#mediaviewer/File:LCD_screen_sizes.svg
Going from 16:10 aspect ratio to 16:9 really shortens the height regardless of the number of vertical pixels. My 30 inch 16:10 kind of towers over the 27" 16:9. It seems like a huge difference in physical size for such a little difference in vertical pixels.
I guess this website explains it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_size#mediaviewer/File:LCD_screen_sizes.svg
Going from 16:10 aspect ratio to 16:9 really shortens the height regardless of the number of vertical pixels. My 30 inch 16:10 kind of towers over the 27" 16:9. It seems like a huge difference in physical size for such a little difference in vertical pixels.